SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Gryba who wrote (152449)12/13/2001 4:06:49 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Constantine, Re: "And I said they [Mercedes] are getting sued for it ( and they may get out of it anyway ). It was a BAD business decision which is exactly what Intel's decision was to compete in the value segment."

1) Intel has not, is not, and will not get sued for competing in the sub-$1000 market.

2) Intel's decision to pursue the sub-$1000 market was one of the best decisions they ever made - more than 50% of the consumer market is now interested in buying PCs under $1000.

3) What the frick does your comment have to do with Intel forcing AMD out of these markets?

This is AMDroid tap-dancing at its finest.

wbmw



To: Charles Gryba who wrote (152449)12/13/2001 4:12:23 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
C, <It was a BAD business decision which is exactly what Intel's decision was to compete in the value segment.>

First you say there's "nothing wrong with that plan," and now you're saying it was a bad business decision?

At least you're consistent in your belief that AMD is somehow "entitled" to 30% market share.

Tenchusatsu