Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13372)	12/13/2001 9:49:29 PM
From: I. N. Vester	Respond to of 99280

Zeev, in your "translation" you said 'If we get to the 1793 area, the "to da moon" scenario...' shall we take that to mean the same as 'if we get at least as low as the 1793 (or lower), the "to da moon alice" scenario...'?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13372)	12/13/2001 10:30:20 PM
From: ajtj99	Respond to of 99280

Thank you, Zeev, for translating the Turnips.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13372)	12/13/2001 10:35:13 PM
From: ajtj99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

BTW, Zeev, you know I was trying to trap the Turnips into a corner so we could all jump all over you if things don't turn out EXACTLY as you indicate it might at the EXACT TIME you believe it may transpire <G>. I am a bit concerned about how a Turnip may react when it is cornered <G>.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13372)	12/13/2001 10:50:44 PM
From: I. N. Vester	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Zeev, sorry, i did not mean to "nitpick" your grammer or logic! just enjoy the complexity of your conditionals. I wonder if your "to da moon" like mine comes from 1960's tv series 'honeymooners' with jackie gleason.... Much more to the point: if we get the 'golden bull rise' way up to naz 2800-3000, how much blood has to flow out of our noses? by that i mean, what level PE's does that take us to on your CSCO's INTC's etc? Are we looking at 80 or 100 times 2003 estimates at that point? Or P/S or whatever metric you use? Is there any actual Fundies then to back up the advance or is it all just 'reinflate, reinflate, reinflate the Naz bubble' with desperate cash?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13372)	12/14/2001 12:21:59 AM
From: Softechie	Respond to of 99280

Zeev, Not enough cash cows left to back up the outrages earnings they're predicting. Cash cows were in telecom and internet sectors which were the growth sectors and longer there. I don't see how Crisco will ever have the growth like in 98-00 again. Cash cows have to come from new growth sectors and I ain't seeing any. They're talking about Asia but please...that's the last place I'll look. Crisco is a fricking liar along with Oracle and Ciena.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13372)	12/14/2001 8:03:14 AM
From: Justa Werkenstiff	Respond to of 99280

Zeev: Comp. 2123 in January gives me a SPX of 1194.96 which would translate to the most expensive market in history in an environment of contracting earnings. I guess the bubble lives on!!!

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13372)	12/15/2001 1:59:00 AM
From: gfs_1999	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Zeev very interesting your forecast, here you have Jerry Favors analysis (December Newsletter) THE BRADLEY INDICATOR As discussed in our November issue, the Bradley Indicator calls for a low near December 4, and then a major rally into April 2002. So far the Dow has reached a low of 9651 intraday on December 3, and has rallied 569 points to an intraday high of 10220 on December 6. We believe there is a strong probability of a further rise into April of next year, and probably beyond. However, several of our Gann indicators suggest a decline back down near or just below 9629 intraday sometime later this month is possible. This would not in any way alter our bullish position for next year. THE NASDAQ We are still bullish on the Nasdaq into next year. We stated that the rally in the Nasdaq in this time frame would be even stronger on a percentage basis than the rally in the Dow, and that has certainly been the case. We believe the Nasdaq is vulnerable to a correction which carries it back below 1899 later this month, but that should represent a buying opportunity. Regards and congratulations for your work. I allways like to read your felling about market direction. I'm posting some Jerry updates at LG message board. GFS