SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (209877)12/13/2001 9:42:04 PM
From: gao seng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The The United Kingdom's Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists out trumps your precious magazine, and they became the first medical organization to warn its abortion practitioners that the abortion-breast cancer link "could not be disregarded." It said that the methodology of the principal ABC (abortion-breast cancer) researcher, Joel Brind, was sound.

--

Abortion/Breast Cancer Link Still Ignored

Breast cancer is linked to reproductive hormones, particularly estrogen.

CBN.com - World Net Daily -- Washington, DC -- Even though 27 out of 35 studies published since 1957 have linked abortion with breast cancer, pro-abortion groups such as Planned Parenthood continue to deny such a link exists and refuse to inform prospective abortion recipients of the studies.

Led by group president Karen Malec, the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer is working to inform the public about a link since abortion providers, as a rule, do not.

"Scientists have been studying this link for 44 years. We are appalled that women haven't been informed about the existence of these studies. Why are women being excluded from this discussion about their own health care?" she remarked. "We intend to correct this grave injustice."

ABC Coalition volunteers in Chicago last month distributed brochures at breast-cancer awareness walks that inform readers about abortion-breast cancer research. The group's web address was also advertised on a Colorado Springs Sky Sox stadium billboard for the baseball team's home-season opener on April 13.

Malec says her organization is alarmed that despite almost a half century of research demonstrating a link between abortion and breast cancer, "women still have not been included in this discussion about their health care. It is indefensible that this information has been censored from women," she said.

"The public was informed when only 5 out of 7 studies linked cellular phones with brain cancer," Malec argued, "so why aren't women entitled to know that more than two dozen studies implicate abortion as a risk factor for this deadly disease? Tragically, the bar has been raised for this risk factor, and 1 in 100 women will die of abortion-induced breast cancer."

Breast cancer is linked to reproductive hormones, particularly estrogen. Although science has yet to define specifically what causes breast cancer, it is uncontested that the sooner a woman has her first child, the lower her risk of developing breast cancer.

According to Dr. Joel Brind, president of the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute and a leading researcher in what is commonly known as the "ABC link," a woman's estrogen level increases hundreds of times above normal upon conceiving -- and one of the first physical changes to the pregnant woman's body occurs in the breasts. That hormone surge leads to the growth of "undifferentiated" cells in the breast as the body prepares to produce milk for the coming baby. Undifferentiated cells are vulnerable to the effects of carcinogens, which can give rise to cancerous tumors later in life.

In the final weeks of a full-term pregnancy, those cells are "terminally differentiated" through a still largely unknown process and are ready to produce milk. Differentiated cells are not vulnerable to carcinogens. However, should a pregnancy be terminated prior to cell differentiation, the woman is left with abnormally high numbers of undifferentiated cells, therefore increasing her risk of developing breast cancer.

The percentage of risk increase is dependent on the age of a woman when she reaches puberty, when she first conceives and the length of time the pregnancy progresses prior to induced abortion. Most studies show a general increase in risk from 30 to 100 percent or more.

Spontaneous abortions, or miscarriages, are not generally associated with increased risk, according to Brind, since they generally occur due to insufficient estrogen hormones to begin with.

Most birth-control pills work by producing hormonal activity similar to that which occurs when conception takes place, thereby making it a suspicious agent in ABC link research as well.

United Kingdom's Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released guidelines on March 13, 2000, to its abortion providers last year cautioning them that ABC link research "cannot be disregarded." The group also examined a 1996 review of the worldwide studies done by Brind, saying the doctor's work was "carefully conducted" and "had no major methodological shortcomings."

earlier this year, estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), which is taken by women after menopause, was added to the nation's list of known carcinogens. ERT is largely the same chemical form of estrogen naturally created by a woman's ovaries in pregnancy. A majority of the known risk factors for breast cancer are associated with an overexposure to estrogen.

n the world's most influential medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, has begun to change its tune about an ABC link, albeit quietly. Three years ago, the NEJM published a Danish study that denied the abortion-breast cancer link. Known as the Melbye study, researchers concluded that "induced abortions have no overall effect on the risk of breast cancer." Also published in the NEJM was an editorial by a National Cancer Institute epidemiologist asserting that "a woman need not worry about the risk of breast cancer" when she contemplates an abortion.

in the text of an article last year, entitled "Assessing the Risk of Breast Cancer" by Katrina Armstrong and her associates from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, the following statement was made: "Other risk factors have been less consistently associated with breast cancer (such as diet, use of oral contraceptives, lactation, and abortion)." The statement, although far from a resounding declaration, represents a significant change from the journal's previous position.

, despite convincing evidence of the dangers of breast cancer from abortions, the lucrative abortion industry continues to deny any link exists. Attacking the credibility of studies conducted by Brind and others, the abortion lobby claims there is no consensus in the scientific community on the subject, and so women are told they are not at risk.

The Planned Parenthood position is that abortion poses no demonstrated health risks," says Nancy L. Sasaki, president of Planned Parenthood Los Angeles. "The link between induced abortion and breast cancer is a theory whose principal promoters oppose abortion regardless of its safety. The theory has not been borne out by research. While Planned Parenthood believes that women should have access to information about all factors that influence the risk of disease, PPLA also believes that women deserve information that is medically substantiated and untainted by a political agenda. Because the research community has not reached a consensus on breast cancer and abortion, Planned Parenthood advises women who are considering terminating a pregnancy that there is no currently demonstrated health risk from abortion that would warrant basing a decision on that factor alone."

Malec and others involved in educating women regarding the abortion-breast cancer link, point out abortion proponents have a political motive for keeping women uninformed. If ABC link information becomes widely acknowledged, the mantra of "safe" abortions could be irreparably damaged.

"Our organization is pro-life for women," asserted Malec. "Unfortunately, when it comes to this politically incorrect information, not everyone is pro-women's health."



More from CBN.com's Health Channel



Rate this Article
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent


Printer Friendly Version



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (209877)12/13/2001 9:48:12 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Everything You Want to Know About Sex and Cancer

Two cancerophobes from South Boston
Used frequent sex as a precaution.
They indulged night and day,
In every known way,
And expired from chronic exhaustion.

How does your sex life affect the chances of your getting cancer? Does the sensuous woman have more or less cancer than the celibate? And how
about the man? Does circumcision help; and whom does it help? And what about orgasmic frequency? There is very little need to answer these
questions, because an increase or decrease in cancer is not likely to deter those who are enjoying sex, nor encourage those who aren't. Nevertheless,
with a "modern" book, we have to have something about sex in it. I will deal with women and men separately because, although their sexual
interaction is a thing in common, the types of cancer that are related to it are not.

Cancer of the breast appears to be influenced to some degree by reproduction. It has been known for some time that there is a relatively high
incidence of breast cancer among nuns, and that marriage, having children, and nursing them appears to reduce the incidence. Since marriage,
having children and nursing are interrelated, it is very difficult to separate these factors. The early work suggested that long-term nursing reduced the
incidence of breast cancer. This has never been substantiated, but we can still say that having children reduced the chances of getting breast
cancer, and having children at a relatively early age appears to reduce the chances of getting breast cancer even more. It is also reasonably certain
that having children and nursing them does not, as it does in mice, increase the incidence of breast cancer. In mice, the more pregnancy, the more
breast cancer. No one has ever satisfactorily explained this discrepancy.

Cancer of the uterine cervix has its highest incidence in prostitutes, and its lowest in nuns. That ought to tell you something.

You can't win, ladies, because what increases the risk of breast cancer decreases the risk of cancer of the uterine cervix: pregnancy reduces the
incidence of cancer of the breast and increases the incidence of cancer of the cervix, while celibacy increases the incidence of cancer of the
breast and reduces the incidence of cancer of the cervix. You might as well do what you enjoy, because in the long haul it makes little difference in
terms of cancer risk