Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Susan G who wrote (13414)	12/14/2001 1:37:54 AM
From: Frederick Langford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

That was great, received this in an email tonight: IT'S GOD'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FORGIVE BIN LADEN IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO ARRANGE THE MEETING * United States Marine Corps Fred

To: Susan G who wrote (13414)	12/14/2001 2:44:26 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Fortune Magazine on Why Enron Went Bust... fortune.com Start with arrogance. Add greed, deceit, and financial chicanery. What do you get? A company that wasn't what it was cracked up to be. _____________________________________________ Here's an interesting passage from the multi-page article... <<...In any conversation about Enron, the comparison with Long-Term Capital Management invariably crops up. In some ways, it looks as if the cost of the Enron debacle is far less than that of LTCM--far less than anyone would have thought possible, in fact (see next story). But in other ways the cost is far greater. Enron was a public company with employees and shareholders who counted on management, the board, and the auditors to protect them. That's why one senior Wall Streeter says of the Enron saga, "It disgusts me, and it frightens me." And that's why, regardless of how the litigation plays out, it feels as though a crime has been committed...>>