SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (209982)12/14/2001 9:15:38 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Exactly, well said neo. Celebrating the uniqueness of all our cultures should be our goal, not fear and oversensitivity.

The point those on the left don't seem to grasp when you drive down this road, is the road is endless. Anyone can claim they are *offended* by something.

The Constitution doesn't say we have a right to not be offended. If we're that sensitive of another persons cultural traditions, then we should look inward toward what is really bothering us.

The insistence that "Merry Christmas" somehow degrades another person and thus should be removed from our public speech, is a symptom of a deep seated hatred toward christianity and our national heritage. Instead of celebrating that our land is inhabited by christians, they simply believe it is an ugliness which should be removed.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And leftists like Ron Sims cannot understand how another person would think the words "Merry Christmas" are beautiful.

There is only one thing worse then insensitivity, that's oversensitivity.



To: Neocon who wrote (209982)12/14/2001 9:20:24 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Neo, one last thing which just struck me. These are the same people who insist on government funding to support pictures which dunk the cross in urine.

So, on the one hand we cannot say "Merry Christmas" because it's offensive. But we *must* support via taxation the right of people to paint pictures of Jesus being dropped in a vat of urine.



To: Neocon who wrote (209982)12/14/2001 10:18:46 AM
From: rich4eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Again you are taking this out of context, the memo was in regards to employees of the county conducting business which is appropriate to keep things religionless