SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hlpinout who wrote (94284)12/14/2001 9:07:58 PM
From: hlpinout  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
RUMORS, TRUTH AND INNUENDO
ShadowRAM

By ShadowRAM
CRN
- 3:10 PM EST Fri., Dec. 14, 2001

DELL EXECUTIVE GETS IN A FEW DIGS AT RIVAL COMPAQ

ORACLEWORLD ATTENDEES PONDER ELLISON'S SUCCESSOR

DECIPHERING COMPAQ'S SMB PARTER LISTING
Dell Computer can't resist getting in its digs at Compaq Computer's expense,even when its cross-Texas rival is down.

At the Raymond James/CRN IT Supply Chain Conference last week at the Intercontinental Hotel in New York, Dell CFO Jim Schneider made a point during his presentation to take another shot at Big Q. Schneider flipped to a slide that showed that Compaq's costs of doing business actually increase the more the company moves to a Dell-like direct sales model.

Hey, Jim? Duh. That's not exactly a news flash to folks who invest in the channel or to folks who have been following Compaq.

No matter what you think about CDW Computer Centers, you have to like the company's TV commercial blitz. You know, the one that features imbecilic corporate klutzes telling IT guys things like, "I downloaded that virus just like you told me not to" and "I'm off to crash the server now, wish me luck."

Apparently, the company, which is trying to build itself into a national brand, has had good enough results with the campaign that CEO John Edwardson, is seriously weighing buying pricey airtime for commercials during the upcoming Super Bowl XXXVI.

There's still a fair amount of buzz coming in the wake of Oracle OpenWorld, where quirky comedy became the rule. Oracle showed a hilarious video of Monty Python's Eric Idle reading fairy tales to the attendees. Fellow Brit and Oracle VP Jeremy Burton was supposed to meet with Idle beforehand to go over plans but was unable to fly to L.A. because of a meeting with his boss, Larry Ellison.

Our personal favorite, though, was a special guest appearance at the show by David St. Hubbins,that's "Dye-vid" to you,of the erstwhile rock group Spinal Tap, who air-guitared his way on stage to deafening accompaniment of "For Those About To Rock We Salute You." Nothing like making segues from heavy metal to Intel's Craig Barrett. We almost got the bends.

Ellison was asked about his "succession problem," which he feels to be no problem at all. In fact, he said he wishes departing sales exec Jay Nussbaum well. Nussbaum is taking the No. 2 slot at KPMG.

Ellison then took time to note the other former Oracle lieutenants who've gone on to head such companies as Siebel, PeopleSoft, i2 and Compaq. "I would compare us to GE . . . with great depth of management. If we lose people, we must have a lot of good people . . . [because] we have a stronger management team now than ever."

He continued: "I'm taking the Jack Welch approach. I'll tell you [who the successor is] right before I leave. The idea of a strong No. 2 is one I tried a few times, and it didn't work out for me. No. 2s can become blinded by the limelight . . . and become less effective. It's very heady . . . and not healthy for Oracle.

When asked if he thought Ray Lane had been blinded by the limelight, Ellison countered: "Am I saying Ray Lane couldn't handle the limelight? I don't know. Write what you want."

In last week's column, we wrote that on Compaq's new SMB Partner Web site seven direct marketers, with CDW topping the list, are referenced before Ingram Micro VentureTech and Tech Data TechSelect members. A Compaq spokeswoman has a simple explanation: The SMB partners are listed in alphabetical order.



To: hlpinout who wrote (94284)12/17/2001 6:03:03 PM
From: hlpinout  Respond to of 97611
 
Ouch.
--
Global notebook sales to challenge 27 million units


Global notebook sales this year will increase 12.3% to 14.4% over 2000 to 26.5-27 million units, according to Dataquest.

Weak desktop sales have burdened the overall PC market in 2001, and PC sales will decline for the first time in more than 10 years. However, notebook sales continued to grow thanks to low component prices, especially for TFT LCD panels, which represent about a third of a notebook’s manufacturing cost. In addition, the price gap between desktops and notebooks has continued to shrink.

The recent popularity of desktop CPU notebooks is not expected to end anytime soon. With the ongoing economic slowdown, the importance of price as a purchasing factor has grown. Desktop CPU notebooks, which are cheaper than models running on mobile CPUs, now account for 10% of the notebook market.

For consumers who are more concerned about function and performance, notebooks are becoming more acceptable as well. The new mobile CPUs on the market nowadays have allowed notebooks to catch up to desktops in speed, performance and system stability.

Dell Computer has continued to increase its lead in the notebook market throughout 2001 with its low-price strategy. Its sold 880,000 notebooks in the first quarter and 930,000 in the second for respective 12.6% and 14% market shares. In the third quarter, Dell increased its efforts in China and Japan and drove its sales to 963,000 units and market share to 15%.

Looking at notebook orders to Taiwan, shipments to Dell could exceed one million units in the fourth quarter. Quanta Computer, the world’s largest notebook maker, produced 180,000 units in each of October and November for Dell, and 200,000 units are projected for December. Compal Electronics and Wistron’s monthly shipments to Dell in the fourth quarter will be around 100,000 units and 60,000-70,000 units, respectively. Foxconn Electronics and Jabil produce motherboards for Dell’s own notebook assembly operation.

Compaq Computer and NEC suffered the largest sales decline among the top 10 notebook companies in the third quarter. The two companies’ third-quarter notebook sales dropped a respective 28.7% and 32.9% year-on-year.

Apple Computer, Acer and Hewlett-Packard (HP) joined Dell as the four top 10 companies that enjoyed year-on-year sales increases in the third quarter. Apple’s orders for the PowerBook (made by Quanta) and the iBook (made by Alpha-Top) in December will reach 100,000 units and 250,000 units, respectively.

Acer’s cumulative sales for the first three quarters were 700,000 units. Its sales were less than that of Apple for the first time in the third quarter. According to International Data Corporation (IDC), Acer sold 260,000 units in each of the first two quarters and 275,000 units in the third. Apple sold a respective 160, 000 units and 240,000 units in the first two quarters, but the figure jumped to 290,000 units in the third quarter, IDC reported.

Global notebook sales in 2001 (million units)

Period
Volume

1H
13.5

3Q
6.4

4Q (forecast)
6.5-7

2001 (forecast)
26.5-27

2000
23.6


Source: Dataquest, compiled by DigiTimes, December 2001

Top notebook company 3Q 2001 sales (thousand units)


Global sales 3Q 2001
Global market share 3Q 2001 (%)
Global sales 3Q 2000
Global market share 3Q 2000
Y/Y growth (%)

Dell
96.3
15.0
81.6
12.2
17.9

Toshiba
80.9
12.6
92.9
13.9
(13.0)

IBM
75.9
11.9
85.3
12.7
(10.9)

Compaq
63.3
9.9
88.9
13.2
(28.7)

Sony
35.6
5.6
39.6
5.9
(10.2)

HP
33.6
5.3
27.1
4.1
23.9

NEC
32.2
5.0
48.1
7.2
(32.9)

Fujitsu
31.5
4.0
37.1
5.5
(15.0)

Apple
29.0
4.5
19.7
2.9
47.3

Acer
27.5
4.3
25.0
3.8
10.0

Global shipments (including other brands)
641
Notebooks represented 21.1% of the PC market
671
Notebooks represented 19.4% of the PC market
(4.6)


Source: Dataquest, compiled by DigiTimes, December 2001.
Note: Fujitsu data excludes 78,000 units sold in Europe by Fujitsu/Siemens in the 3Q.


digitimes.com



To: hlpinout who wrote (94284)12/17/2001 6:16:45 PM
From: hlpinout  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Kinda sums it up.
--
New Survey Reveals Reasons, Recovery Strategies, And Rankings In Tough Year For Technology Brands -- New Bruised & Battered Brands Poll Finds Industry Slump Severely Hurt Top High-Tech Brands; Companies Must Regain Trust Of Marketplace And Focus On Customers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Story Filed: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:04 AM EST

SILICON VALLEY, CA, Dec 17, 2001 (INTERNET WIRE via COMTEX) -- Global technology marketing executives are acutely aware that their industry's top brands have suffered in 2001, and they're willing to shoulder some of the blame, according to the results of a new survey study entitled The Bruised and Battered Brands Poll 2001.

The poll results were released today by Liquid Agency, a premier San Jose-based technology brand marketing firm who fielded the study in conjunction with The Sausalito Group, a strategic intelligence company, and Neale-May & Partners, a strategic marketing and communications company. The new report captures the opinions of more than 700 leading technology marketers in 17 countries and provides perspectives on what may be high-tech's biggest "brand recession" ever. It also reveals the strategies for brand survival and recovery. Survey respondents ranked both the best and worst brand performances for technology companies and high-tech CEOs in 2001 and provided the most important brand revitalization strategies and insights into brand leadership and letdown.

Survey Result Highlights:

- 80 percent of marketing respondents strongly agree that the industry
downturn has hurt technology brands.
- While financial losses and stock price depreciation were major causes
for brand erosion, industry "hype" comes in a close third, according
to respondents.
- Getting close to the customer shows up in two of the three top
strategies for sustaining brand value in the current downturn.
- Public relations was identified as the most effective way to market
and create demand for technology brands in a tight economic climate,
followed by customer relationship management and brand advertising.
- Bill Gates of Microsoft and Larry Ellison of Oracle showed up in the
top three list of CEOs who best personify their company brands and
the top three list of those who most damaged or compromised their
brands in 2001.
- Marketers ranked the top three technology CEOs that best personify
their brands as 1) Bill Gates, 2) Larry Ellison and 3) Michael Dell.
- They ranked the top three CEOs who most harmed their brands in 2001
as 1) Carly Fiorina, 2) Larry Ellison and 3) Bill Gates.
- The three companies voted as having best maintain brand value in 2001
were Microsoft, IBM and Dell
- The three technology companies voted worst at maintaining brand value
were HP, Compaq and Cisco, and all three decreased in market value
over the same period.
"This year has highlighted more than any other the need among technology companies to embrace a brand business strategy," said Alfredo Muccino, Creative Director at Liquid Agency. "The results of the study reflect that brands can be compromised by a litany of business problems, and as such branding needs to become more of a boardroom issue in the strategic business decision process."

Brand Building and Recovery Strategies

The poll, completed by over 700 technology marketers in the U.S. and abroad, showed that two of the top three rated strategies for sustaining brands in challenging times involved customer relationship building. At the same time, the respondents found that it's more important than ever to reduce confusion about what the brand stands for, build credibility, and speak with a clear, consistent voice that communicates real differentiation.

"We believe that due to technology's legacy to engineering and the focus on features, technology brands have primarily focused on innovation or performance as opposed to building relationships based on trust and confidence," said Muccino. "The fact that many technology marketers are emphasizing growing and nurturing the relationship with key customers seems to be a reflection of a growing awareness that brands are built over time by taking care of customer's real needs and concerns and by being consistent with the brand essence and values."

CEO Ratings

Respondents rated trust as the overwhelming critical element of CEO branding, followed by market insight and vision and demonstrated leadership.

In terms of representing their corporate brands, some CEOs elicited both good and bad reactions, suggesting that CEO brand visibility can lead to strong positive or negative brand swings (or both). For example, Microsoft's Bill Gates and Oracle's Larry Ellison clearly are polarizing the industry, with both executives ranking among the top three CEOs who best personify their companies' brands and that most compromised their brands in 2001.

On Larry Ellison, one poll taker wrote, "Oracle is much like him - brash, loud, and immensely optimistic - even in the face of insurmountable odds."

Michael Dell was also ranked among the top three CEOs who best personified their brands, but didn't weigh in as an executive who damaged his brand. One comment described Michael Dell as "the founder with the company name that is swift, young, persistent, confident, optimistic, and solid." In short "He is Dell," said another.

Hewlett-Packard's Carly Fiorina, on the other hand, currently embroiled in controversy around the company's performance and proposed merger with Compaq, was ranked number one for having compromised her company's brand in 2001. One survey response stated: "She has taken a brand that was growing steadily and cast it into chaos - for no good reason, as the deal, while it may be good, was not communicated in a clear and articulate manner, leading to the current negative perceptions."

Many high-tech CEOs evidently need help to effectively communicate and embody the brand values of their company. For example, some 43 percent of respondents indicated that their top executive was not highly effective as a brand emissary for their company, though over 50 percent believed that their CEO believes in the company brand.

How Companies Fared

Marketing executives' choices for the best and worst high-tech brands of 2001 seemed to have a strong basis in financial performance and industry hype.

Microsoft, IBM and Dell were identified by marketing executives as the three leading technology companies that best maintained brand value during the past year. Commented one participant: "Microsoft has excellent earnings, beat the Justice Department rap, delivers new products, and extends market reach. "IBM has diversified applications, a smart focus on easy in - easy out processes, and a strong team. Dell has good PR."

The three companies most frequently mentioned as doing a poor job of maintaining brand value, on the other hand, suffered declines in share price. Presumably, the recent negative media and sentiments around the challenged HP/Compaq merger have taken a toll on brand value as well.

One poll taker mentioned, "Is there anyone besides Michael Capellas and Carly Fiorina that thinks the merger is a good idea?" A second respondent said, "John Chambers couldn't foresee Cisco revenues would drop off a cliff - they don't manufacture."

Partners and Report Information

The complete results report of the Bruised & Battered Brands Poll is available at www.liquidagency.com.

The 2001 Bruised and Battered Brands was fielded online from November 19-30, 2001 by The Sausalito Group, a strategic intelligence firm. Cooperating partners in the poll include Liquid Agency, Neale-May & Partners, the American Marketing Association, InfoWorld, Technology Marketing Magazine, @d:tech Conference, and GlobalFluency, The Independent Network of Influence.

About Liquid Agency Inc.

Liquid Agency, Inc. is a brand marketing firm providing strategy, design and implementation of comprehensive brand marketing programs. Liquid Agency's services include strategic brand development, brand identity, advertising, packaging, Web and interactive services, and all types of marketing communications collateral. Based in San Jose, Calif., Liquid Agency plans to expand its operations to better service clients in San Francisco, New York and Chicago. Current client engagements include projects for Adobe, Intel, Lucent, and Seagate. Additionally, Liquid Agency is working on projects for the San Jose Downtown Business Association, The Redevelopment Office for the City of San Jose, and Federal Realty Investment Trust (Santana Row).

About The Sausalito Group

The Sausalito Group is a leader in providing senior management with rapid strategic intelligence to help them make faster, more effective decisions. The Sausalito Groups enterprise-wide programs simultaneously yield deeper, more immediate insights into the motivations, needs and wants of customers, employees and prospects. The Sausalito Group's proprietary,on-line technology combines both qualitative and quantitative methodologies that help increase satisfaction, build customer loyalty and create a sustainable competitive advantage. Its instruments have been deployed in more than 27 countries worldwide and currently serve some of the world's leading companies, including NEC, J.P.Morgan Chase, United Airlines, Philips, E*TRADE Group and Palm, Inc.

About Neale-May & Partners

Neale-May & Partners is a leading strategic marketing and communications company focused on shaping perceptions in the global technology market. The $15 million firm helps technology-driven clients create brand equity and market value through inventive go-to-market programs and public relations campaigns. Neale-May represents clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies from its Silicon Valley, San Francisco, and New York City offices. Neale-May & Partners has been ranked as one of Silicon Valley's top three technology PR firms and ranked among the top 10 independent PR firms nation wide. For additional information, visit www.nealemay.com or call (650) 328-5555 x110.

CONTACT: Sarah Miller
Senior Associate
Neale-May & Partners
650-328-5555 x272
Alfredo Muccino
Chief Creative Officer
Liquid Agency
408-850-8833
Copyright 2001 Internet Wire, All rights reserved.