Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : North American Palladium(AMEX:PAL)- PGM Producer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (960)	12/17/2001 12:54:31 PM
From: Bruce Robbins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 976

Well I guess I was wrong <bg>! Pd is not too exciting but PAL/PDL is moving up well. Perhaps the funds are buying?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (960)	2/26/2002 4:53:42 PM
From: Archie Meeties	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 976

Liz, did you notice that Pd demand from developing countries nearly doulbed in 2001, while falling everywhere else? Even a return to 2000 levels of consumption by Europe and NA would put the Pd market back into a deficit if the developing nations begin to like better air (it motivated you, didn't it?). I also think that the engineering that reintroduced Pt as a catalyst when Pd was hovering near $1000 can just as quickly take advantage of the $100 price difference between Pt and Pd. Should there be any price difference in the two if they can be used interchangeably as catalysts? Given time, Pd will return to parity with Pt.