SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rich4eagle who wrote (210712)12/17/2001 5:12:34 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
No, that we should not be hostile to the dominant culture just because it happens to belong to the majority. That our values are bound up with religion, and it should be respected. That we should not try to eradicate our traditions just because they are not universal. Things along those lines. Even the majority deserves some respect.....



To: rich4eagle who wrote (210712)12/17/2001 5:32:19 PM
From: Kenneth V. McNutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
and your point is? that we should practice Christianity as a national religion?

I suggest to settle once and for eternity(does anyone believe in eternity?) this difference in religions by using one name encompassing all, therefore making us all brothers(sisters) under one(___?)(fill in here name of deity).
Eligibility to be encompassed states the religion must have a predetermined number of adherents, the number to be worked out in an ad hoc sub rosa committee. Lets start with a basic name, shall we. Prejudice abounds here so let's begin.

Holy Chrisislabhuhind(sorta rolls off the tongue,eh?) I know..I know, there are many, but these are the main ones. Please feel free to add on to the name of our new religion until we get a consensus. All entries must be received by midnight
of some day in the future to be determined. But one weighty matter at a time, please.

Your humble pasprieimullvic.

Ken