Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheStockFairy who wrote (4660)	12/18/2001 11:50:05 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 46821

Thanks for that description, TSF. Tell me, with all that's been written about security holes in 802.11x, are you at all concerned about it? Once again, I'm assuming that you are using .11b Is that correct? and if so, did you purchase your own access point and pc card, or is this something that your provider issued to you as a part of the deal (as a CLEC would supply a dsl modem)? Curious. Btw, during the past year a couple of business plans have crossed my desk that were based on 802.11x. One, in particular, seemed interesting. It addressed college campuses and dorms. I looked negatively at both plans from a venture standpoint, however, citing the risk that, imo, was inevitably at hand, since we might very well be seeing the beginnings of a new kind of framework (commons) that everyday folks [and an army of other like-minded startups who were quick to identify this a low barrier-to-entry play] were considering, and who would soon be implementing, themselves. My cautions cited that unless there was a value add that you could lock in and protect and charge a premium for, then one should avoid wasting their time and capital. Unless, of course, motives centered on matters that weren't entirely profit-based. I.e., where setting up a network was a matter of enabling community communications, for example, in a more egalitarian way, for the sake of enrichment through communications, itself. The latter model appears to be catching on in many areas. fwiw. FAC

To: TheStockFairy who wrote (4660)	12/18/2001 2:34:24 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

Check that, I just visited the site and obtained the answers to my previous questions. Btw, if these folks are friends of yours you may want to tell them that they have their month-to-month and 2-year contract terms reversed (as of a few minutes ago, in any event). starnetwx.com

To: TheStockFairy who wrote (4660)	1/2/2002 2:42:56 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

Article: Broadband Strategy Got Enron in Trouble Bid to Create Market for Fiber-Optic Space Included Aggressive Accounting By Peter Behr Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, January 1, 2002; Page E01 Enron Corp. was already a formidable company in January 2000, after a decade-long transformation from a stodgy gas-pipeline company into the nation's largest energy trader. Then it spoke the B-word -- broadband. Chairman Kenneth L. Lay and chief executive Jeffrey K. Skilling told stock market analysts that month that Enron was about to create a market for trading space on the high-speed fiber-optic networks that form the backbone for Internet traffic. Asking few questions, investors sped to buy the stock, as they did with most things Internet-related at the time. Enron shares shot up from $40 in January more than $70 in less than two months and went as high as $90 that summer. The stock price gains helped created a windfall for Enron executives and directors, who sold $924 million of company stock in 2000 and 2001. Kenneth D. Rice, who ran Enron Broadband Services, sold more than 1 million Enron shares for a total of $70 million in 2000 and the first half of 2001, according to regulatory and court filings. He left the company in August. Enron's broadband foray collapsed this year. A business that Skilling had said would eventually add $40 billion to Enron's stock value produced just $16 million in revenue in this year's second quarter, before it was closed down. Enron's recent financial disclosures show that its claims of success in broadband last year included large gains from trades with private partnerships it had set up itself. And using aggressive accounting practices, it assigned exaggerated values to the broadband contracts it traded with others in the industry, greatly inflating its actual revenue and profit, Enron insiders and analysts now say. "From a common-sense standpoint, we knew it was smoke and mirrors," said Rudy Sutherland Jr., a former Enron broadband trader. "The [profit] margins were whatever they decided," said a former Enron vice president familiar with the broadband trading, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. In many instances "they were trading with themselves," he said. As prices for fiber-optic circuits plummeted last year, Enron tried and failed to lure telecommunications giants that used broadband -- such as MCI WorldCom Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. -- to trade with it and create a true market. Carol Coale, an analyst at Prudential Securities who heard Enron's repeated claims that its trading operations were growing rapidly, said: "These guys were great spin doctors. They had the answers. The answers were lies." continued at: washingtonpost.com