Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (41149)	12/18/2001 5:08:29 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Otherwise, I agree with him that it is none of my bus." You chose to overlook this comment. "claim that I'm the one who took the opportunity to make this your business when all I did was respond to your post. That's dishonest." Not dishonest what-so-ever. I posted to E regarding my views of how sloppily the Christian Vernacular gets wielded and made a point to say this particular issue with you was of no concern to me. As you challenged me on my perspective you seem to imply that it involves your issue and are now labeling my position dishonest. It now becomes my issue. "Well, I guess it's time to replace all the dictionaries on the world and simply submit all usage questions to Jewel." My observations are practical and true. I was unaware of tossing a guantlet but your presentation definitely seems gloved. To hang your dictionary where it doesn't apply is an imposition and a device of oppression. Do you have a point that you are trying to make, because if so I am missing it?