Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (41204)	12/18/2001 8:12:24 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

You know what's interesting, E? There , of course, is no "just between us". We have never met, never even spoken on the phone. The facts we are discussing are all based upon publicly-made posts, both here and on IHUB. Well, if the "us" you're talking about is you and me, there were a number of emails and private messages. Not everything that has been said between us is or has been public. And I, for one, have kept what you wrote about in your emails completely private, as you asked me to. And even deleted certain things from public posts which you asked me to.

To: Poet who wrote (41204)	12/18/2001 8:22:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

This is one of the most bizarre dramas i've seen played out on SI. I thought "charged" with being a Christian minister was a bit off the wall, too, given that I believe he is a Quaker, and unless I'm mistaken, Quakers are Christians. Then I realized it was a way of gratuitously changing the subject from the fact that he claimed he was a minister to the specific denomination, or church-affiliation, of his ministerhood. But there's no point. CH used to be a different person, you know. Really. He was nice. He was a decent human being. I wonder what happened.

To: Poet who wrote (41204)	12/18/2001 8:44:16 PM
From: E	Respond to of 82486

This is one of the most bizarre dramas i've seen played out on SI. I thought "charged" with being a Christian minister was a bit off the wall, too, given that I believe he is a Quaker, and unless I'm mistaken, Quakers are Christians. Then I realized it was a way of gratuitously changing the subject from the fact that he claimed he was a minister to the specific denomination, or church-affiliation, of his ministerhood. But there's no point. CH used to be a different person, you know. Really. He was nice. He was a decent human being.