Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (11973)	12/19/2001 11:52:55 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

>>Thus it would seem that the historical record will be difficult to use to separate out the effects of the gold standard vs the effects of fractional reserve banking.<< This is one of the problems, but there's no getting around it, because it's there. Other problems are whether a country decides to use gold, silver, or both, and at what exchange rate. These problems could be solved by simply insisting that gold and/or silver are the only forms of money, but that won't work, IMO. People can write checks, and people can discount promissory notes, both of which can circulate as if they were money, and I don't know how you can say they are not money. According to Hawtrey, during the bank panics of 1907, 1893, 1873, and 1857, even though banks suspended payments to their depositors in cash, depositors continued to write checks and the machinery of clearing remained in operation. During the panic of 1873, there were three media of payment - inconvertible paper, which was legal tender money; gold, which was used in foreign trade transactions, and was at a premium over paper; and bank credit, by which I think he means checks.