SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Covered Calls for Dummies Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (3164)12/19/2001 2:38:46 PM
From: holland  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5205
 
I ran the numbers thru my probability software and found that there was a 0% chance of reaching 3.25 and 1.26% that it would reach 46.

Holland



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (3164)12/19/2001 2:52:16 PM
From: Dominick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5205
 
wonder if you're not misinterpreting or misapplying IV.

That could be a good possibility. But, I got the method of determining the possible range a stock could move using IV from Bernie Schaeffer's book "The Option Advisor", pages 68, 69. Low volatility stocks have low price ranges. High volatility stocks have large ranges. 87% is high. In fact using my source, (Power Analyzer), NTAP has a 90 day HV of over 100% and a one day IV of 93% which would make the ranges wider.

The only mix-up, I think would be is, does the IV number pertain to an annual rate or to the life of that particular option. Since an option has a limited life, I believe the assigned IV number is for the life of that option. It wouldn't make sense being an annual rate due to the option's limited life.

Regarding your 32% figure, the stock price doesn't have move at all. But, the writers of that option gave it the high volatility because they felt due to the characteristics of NTAP, it's possible, (operative word), it could end anywhere within that range.

If I'm misinterpreting any of this stuff set me straight cause I'm a newbie at this. Plus, this thread is for dummies
so I'm amply qualified for this.

Regards,

Dominick