Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (970)	12/19/2001 4:32:59 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39344

Marcos, I have followed YBR and I don'think they are moving because of the silver stuff.

To: marcos who wrote (970)	12/19/2001 5:22:31 PM
From: russwinter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39344

<what extent RCF will rape the minority shareholders > You're kidding yourself about this deal my friend. Here's the facts: This offer brings the shares outstanding up to about 115.6 million. The market cap (at the 5 cents paid by the pirates) will be US 3.7 million. The negative working capital and debt structure will reduced from the $1,265,000 PP proceeds to about US$3 million (a lot of payables were handled in October when they screwed the vendors) if my calc is right. Therefore the enterprise value will be US$ 6.7 million. I know mining assets are cheap, but doesn't that strike you as highway robbery for a million ounce deposit (cash cost 165-170) with an operating facility that has been put through the startup paces (Jim Steele to issue report on this aspect)? And for sake of argument, let's just call Marathon a freebie. And objectively, shouldn't a US$2.9m loan to a "syndicate" (in the Sicilian sense of the word) be an obstacle that should be overcome by any management worth it's salt. This is not THAT big a loan against this kind of property. And, I find it odd that they hired Haywood for a "financial solution", and then Haywood's advisor John Hicks becomes the new GEO CEO and this travesty gets put together. Was a real effort made to find a third party consolidation that might at least pay a legitimate price to rid this RCF paper or even just make the quarterly payments? I simply can't accept that a 39.7 million share PP at 5 cents, a 10% net project cash flow royalty, a 40% IRR, and who knows what else, is the legitimate financial solution that these pirates could come up with. They must think the GEO shareholders just fell of the cabbage truck. I'm outraged.