Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (211231)	12/19/2001 6:30:15 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

1) Yes, "If we were a business, it would be considered sound policy to go into debt for capital expenditures <assuming a good business plan, and a rational economic use for the capital expenditure>, rather than trying to pay as you go".... Leverage has it's purposes. BUT WE ARE A COUNTRY, NOT A BUSINESS. Borrowing great gobs of money to spend on - non capital investments like - transfer payments, farm subsidies, military spending that the Pentagon doesn't ask for but happens to fall in some Congressman's backyard, etc., etc., DECREASES THE ECONOMY'S POTENTIAL RATE OF GROWTH (because it diverts from private investment activity where the velocity of money is greater, and the contribution to the economy's productivity is higher). 2) Correct. The Soviets cooked their economic numbers for many years. But it is now well established that the under-performance of their economy relative to the Capitalist West's began many years ago. So, no, they didn't collapse all sudden and unexpected-like in the '80s. It wasn't because of Star Wars (although that explanation made for a very 'Hollywood-like' and cinematic explanation).