Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (211767)	12/20/2001 3:53:10 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Srex a perspective, defending anyone is noble as long as the defense does not use an attack on a victim as part of the defense. I don't care if anyone defends a rapist. I do care when they falsely attack others to defend the guilty. Using relative morality or equivocating the actions of others (victims) is at best very questionable and at worst obscene character assassination of the vilest sort. In hindsight mr. bill's success was built over a foundation of real rape skeletons. This further shows the blind take no prisoners defense tactics of mr. & mrs bill. Remember also the letter from Jaunita Broaddrick to mrs. bill that clearly outlines the threats by mrs. bill against Ms Broaddrick concerning what would happen if see ever exposed mr. bill. But these skeletons also show the utter stupidity of mr. bill for putting as risk his Presidency or a person with a uncontrollable sickness and addiction that made him mentally unfit to be President. You express well relative merits in the case of Ms Tripp and mr. bill. But both aggressive dialog (moi)and civil (vu) brought out the same opinions on facts. But pressure also brought intellectual weaseling. What method is best is questionable at all times. But not to long ago I found frustration but no weasel in many. have a merry my good friend. tom watson tosiwmee