SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (14260)12/20/2001 6:06:41 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
the map shows an offer of 95% of the West Bank

That is a fair comment. Of course the Palestinians should have negotiated some straighter border lines from that on a give and take basis. They didn't as you have recorded.

I do wonder though why Israel has always kept the "kill ratio" in it's favor during this conflict. It's ratio of Palestinian civilians dead to Israeli civilians dead is 5:1 to 15:1 depending how you argue the figures...

btselem.org

The math of conflict suggest a ratio of less the 1:1 to enforce co operation...

Message 16737538

I know elections and politics play into this equation...but the math suggests it's right. A less of a gamble to play then all out war. All out war is where it's going right now. The numerical advantage of the Arabs just have to keep fighting these wars, one after the other, until they get a win.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (14260)12/21/2001 2:36:20 PM
From: Elmer Flugum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
That maximalist position returns ~22% of the Palestinian Mandate to the Palestinians.

Guess who gets the lion's share?

I take your land, offer you less than 22% of what should have been ALL of your nation, call them rebellious (terrorists) and call them maximalists?

Sounds like Blame the Victims game to me.