Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (211942)	12/20/2001 9:05:12 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

jorj, you take a post in the middle of the dialog and after other comments you had made. This is after You had stated this. "BTW: which of the $18M paid for exposing this little tidbit? I didn't know that Linda Tripp (who I consider the most vile actor in this little play) received any money for divulging Monica's secret.... " So this statement to me reads Jorj considers Linda Tripp the most vile actor in this little play. You also stated that mr. bills betrayal of his wife and family was not as vile. All of my rhetorical assertions develop from our dialog and the fact that you have stood by that assertion. Jorj X. McKie considers Linda Tripp he most vile actor in this little play. This is a stupid statement based upon stupid logic. I do not find anything that Ms Tripp did in the context of the position she was forced into to in any way vile. Some find it disturbing. Finding it the vilest in this little play I would say is your ignorance of life showing. My posts detailed factual context and you stood by your assertion. The rhetorical implications I used to show where the logic of that statement led. Take a particular example. Inductively define the general rule and then state other inferred consequences based upon the general rule. tom watson tosiwmee 16813270