Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (211954)	12/20/2001 10:18:28 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The post you quote is the continuation of a dialog. These are not statements made in some isolated context Then back up your logic using quotes from my posts. Here is the post where you say "you are a total complete 100% ass." Message 16813377 Notice the period at the end of the statement. As to superlative, what you consider the vilest I consider not vile at all. So I have no reference point for your thinking. Indeed in that I clearly stated what was not vile and you stated that others, mr. bill and monica were less vile than what I consider not vile at all I could go anywhere. What the hell are you saying? Are you saying that because you don't consider Tripp's actions to be vile that when I say that Monica's and Bill's actions were less vile, that means that I mean that the actions aren't vile? Is that what you are really trying to say? You made statements and stood by them even as I qualified and quantified my own. What is less than not vile. not vile. not as vile. no big deal. Yes, it does appear that is what you are trying to say. Amazing. When I make my statements, I am not making them in relation to your scale of good and bad, I am making them on my own. I don't care how you qualify or quantify your views, that has no bearing on how I express my views. As far as me remembering what I said, you are quite clearly suffering from massive delusions. I said it once before, I think that you are very likely a liberal who is posing as a conservative to make conservatives look bad. Nobody can be this obtuse and function in society. But then again, that may be where I am making a bad assumption. You have failed completely to show how you could logically make the conclusions that you did based on my words. You have misrepresented my words and my views repeatedly. You have done it intentionally and subsequently confirmed that you believed your conclusions were made on logical inferences. When called on it, you can provide NOTHING to support your claims. And to claim that they are sarcastic and rhetorical while repeatedly claiming that they are logically inferred again proves your intellectual dishonesty.