Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Terayon - S CDMA player (TERN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (1419)	12/21/2001 10:10:39 PM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 1658

Right on cue...just as expected/predicted, you again reply with no explanation nor remorse for your lying. The opinion you offered in your link was just another. Try posting the final follow-up report you mentioned. Then, you will post your lie again. ooooo, the great swami knows! Follow the leader folks, if you must, because Freedom Works(and you might learn a needed lesson, should you try to follow swami) Dan B

To: Pluvia who wrote (1419)	12/22/2001 1:10:49 AM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 1658

Correction. No need to look to your final report, the report you just posted lies too. Terayon did suggest strongly that its proprietary technology would be in the DOCSIS 2.0 standard. Not only does DOCSIS 2.0 now officially include their technology, but of course, Cablelabs simply never said it wouldn't, as you falsely claimed. It is one thing to say it is your "EXPRESS opinion" that Cablelabs said a thing, but quite another to realize that they simply DID NOT in fact say it at all, and that this really isn't a matter of opinion. You lied here, period. And you took it significantly further later when you flatly stated TERAYON didn't have DOCSIS products for sale at all, when in fact they did. Lying doesn't get much worse than this. Yes, you belong in jail. I don't see a significant point in your little report that isn't suspect as all get out. For instance, looking into the stock sales history for company officers revealed to me that no share counts outside of historical Terayon insider sales norms were sold at the time in question, in my EXPRESS opinion(LOL). Anyone gaining from tagging along in your parade here, finds themselves with ill-gotten gain. Perhaps that doesn't bother some of you out there. Enjoy, Dan B

To: Pluvia who wrote (1419)	2/25/2002 2:17:30 PM
From: majormember	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1658

To Dan: Don't know you, but in reading your posts, you don't acknowledge the pure exquistness of Steve calling TERN a Short at $162. Barely after TERN's C.C., the stock began to drop like a falcon who had it's wings cut off- STRAIGHT DOWN!!! It was priceless,, but you had to be there to enjoy it. Absolute, Pure genious by Steve... If I had ever doubted his saavy before, it was gone by the time TERN fell to the 50's in a week, when most folks covered. The whole story unravelled as beautifully as Sarah Hughes winning the Gold Medal- except without the surprise!!!! Cheers, Skane PS- STEVE- PM any more TERN's,, PLEASE :-)

To: Pluvia who wrote (1419)	3/19/2002 11:06:40 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1658

By the way, as you rallied the shorts with TERN priced in the 80's or so, only to bail quickly(prior to this great and widespread fall to your favor), you could have sold CMTO short instead. I can't believe you listened to that Mudge gal's hysterics, Tern is about 1/10th to 1/15 of its former price, while CMTO is about 1/30 to 1/50 of its former price. The oft decried chasm between the two is greater than ever in Terayons favor! A good sign, but my frigging cable provider says it is offering 1.5gb service now- and for only perhaps 20 bucks more than it costs to keep a full slate of movie channels, as they are offering "all they have" for $99 per month. Meanwhile, without a subscription, I gather that Gilder touts a company out east somewhere that multiples thru-put on cable some 4 times. Former CMTO chief technology officer and regular S.I. thread member Mark Laubach long ago went off with a company claiming 10 times(something S.I. technocrats clearly seemed to assure me couldn't happen soon if ever, on cable). If this keeps up, something may emerge sooner than I recently imagined, that is VERY fast and cheap indeed...obviating much of the recent past as broadband becomes truly abundant(as Gilder would say), used by untold millions, and offers perhaps millions of video "channels" to potentially over-rule network TV content wherever available. After that, time and technology will march on as, Freedom Works, Dan B P.S. Sorry if I'm repeating myself somewhat, again.