SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (8804)12/21/2001 4:40:46 PM
From: Terry D  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
ASW - They closed that pig at 10 on 100 shares - scummers. It was at 9 with a minute to go and it is at 9 now. (Screws with margin balance on the short side.)



To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (8804)12/21/2001 8:20:42 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Homestore to restate results "I don't think it was a total fraud," said Rashtchy.

Homestore to restate results

By Andrea Orr


PALO ALTO, Calif., Dec 21 (Reuters) - Internet real estate service Homestore.com Inc. <HOMS.O> Friday said its troubles could run deeper than its recent losses suggest, and that it will probably have to restate results for earlier quarters as it conducts an inquiry of accounting practices.

The news followed a surprise announcement from Homestore last month that its revenues had dropped dramatically and that its outlook going forward would be much worse than expected.

In a brief statement the company issued on Friday, it gave no reason for the accounting probe and a spokesman declined to comment on what had prompted the inquiry.

However, analysts and investors had become suspicious of the company's accounting practices ever since it changed its outlook in November.

Homestore, an online destination for everything related to real estate from decorating tips to realtor referrals, was going strong as recently as this summer, when it reported its second quarter sales had more than doubled. Most Wall Street analysts had held the company in high regard and said it was the rare dot-com business model that could work.

So although it was just one of many of dot-coms to fall from grace, its reversal of fortunes seemed particularly severe and swift.

In November, Homestore reported a third quarter loss of $106 million, but more strikingly, it said that its advertising revenue had fallen 44 percent from just the prior quarter.

"I think what I said at the time was that it just did not add up," said U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray "It suggested that they may have been recording revenues in a manner that was not customary."

Other sources familiar with the company's accounting methods said Friday that Homestore had sometimes signed long-term deals in which it would receive revenue over a long period of time, but then recorded all the revenues up front. The danger of course, was that the advertiser would cancel the deal halfway through.

"(Homestore) would tell the advertisers that they could cancel the deal any time they wanted, but that it wanted a purchase order up front," the source said.

In its last earnings statement, Homestore disclosed that it had lost three of its major advertisers and would probably not be able to replace that revenue.

Homestore shares closed up 34 cents to $3.60 a share on Friday, before announcement was released. The stock is well off its 52-week high of $37.25.

Still, analysts say it appears the company's errors were more due to naive optimism about its growth potential than any intentional wrong doing.

"I don't think it was a total fraud," said Rashtchy.

19:49 12-21-01



To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (8804)12/21/2001 8:37:18 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Class Action Lawsuit Commenced On December 21, 2001 on Behalf of Purchasers Of A.C.L.N., Ltd., (ASW) by Abbey Gardy, LLP


NEW YORK, Dec. 21 /PRNewswire/ -- A securities class action lawsuit was commenced on December 21, 2001 on behalf of all persons who acquired A.C.L.N., Ltd. (NYSE: ASW) ("ACLN" or the "Company") securities between December 21, 1998 and December 20, 2001, inclusive ("Class Period"). A copy of the complaint is available from the Court or from Abbey Gardy, LLP. Please contact us by phone at (800) 889-3701 or by email at nkaboolian@abbeygardy.com.

The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District Court of New York. Named as defendants in the complaint are ACLN, Joseph Bisschops, the Company's Chairman and Managing Director, Aldo Labiad, the Company's Chief Executive and Operating Officer and Managing Director, and Alex De Ridder, the Company's Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

The Complaint charges defendants with violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaint alleges, among other things, that beginning with its Public Offering on June 26, 1998, if not before, defendants commenced a continuing scheme, ending no earlier than December 20, 2001, to mislead the investing public and conceal ACLN's true financial state and business prospects. The truth about ACLN was undisclosed until the publication of an investigative report about ACLN by thestreet.com on December 20, 2001. Upon publication of that report, shares of ACLN, which had never traded below $19 per share since the end of 2000, fell from $26.11 per share to a low of $6.20 per share, closing at $9.40 per share. The December 20, 2001 report disclosed among other things, that:

From the time ACLN went public, on June 26, 1998, until it filed an annual report with the SEC on June 29, 2000, as many as 2,265,221 shares held by entities controlled by Chairman Joseph Bisschops -- 29% of his total holdings -- vanished from the "principal and management shareholders" list in the company's SEC filings. The missing shares belong to four of Bisschops' entities, whose names also disappeared from the list: Pearlrose Holdings International, Scott Investments, Gilbert Management and Emerald Sea Marine.

The Complaint also alleges that defendants have been claiming that ACLN has assets that it does not in fact own -- the Sea Atef. Moreover, defendants used the purported purchase of the Sea Atef to conceal their diversion of ACLN funds to entities affiliated with Bisschops in undisclosed related-party transactions. Defendants have been booking revenues as if the Sea Atef was in continuous operation, during a period when it was in fact not. Defendants have been understating their selling, general and administrative expenses. They have been re-characterizing payments to related-parties after the fact to conceal those payments when they were made. Further, they have been overstating the number of cars that they sold and, consequently, their sales revenue. Finally, ACLN's revenue-recognition practices do not comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or their own representations.

The Complaint further alleges that defendants' misrepresentations caused the price of A.C.L.N. securities to be artificially inflated throughout the Class Period.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all those who purchased or otherwise acquired A.C.L.N. securities during the Class Period. If you purchased or otherwise acquired A.C.L.N. Limited securities during the Class Period, and either lost money on the transactions or still hold the securities, you may wish to join in the action to serve as lead plaintiff. In order to do so, you must meet certain requirements set forth in the applicable law and file appropriate papers no later than February 19, 2002.

A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as "lead plaintiffs." Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain Abbey Gardy, LLP, or other counsel of your choice, to serve as your counsel in this action.

Abbey Gardy, LLP has been retained as one of the law firms to represent the Class. The attorneys at Abbey Gardy, LLP have extensive experience in securities class action cases, and have played lead roles in major cases resulting in the recovery of hundreds of millions of dollars to investors. If you would like to discuss this action or if you have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights as a potential class member or lead plaintiff, you may contact Nancy Kaboolian of Abbey Gardy, LLP at (800) 889-3701 or email nkaboolian@abbeygardy.com.

MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here

tbutton.prnewswire.com

SOURCE Abbey Gardy, LLP

CO: Abbey Gardy, LLP; A.C.L.N., Ltd.

ST: New York

IN:

SU: LAW

12/21/2001 19:12 EST prnewswire.com



To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (8804)12/21/2001 10:12:44 PM
From: Ocean_Joe  Respond to of 19428
 
Auric,

Been out awhile. Gettin back to tradin. NAS mood ring is turnin down IMO and I want to play. What are your current shorts?

TTWO chart looks about to fall off cliff. Gonna get in on that tumble on Mon. Others?

Ocean Joe



To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (8804)5/10/2002 8:29:49 AM
From: gringodoc  Respond to of 19428
 
INTL!

Hola Auric:

Congrats to your affiliate in San Francisco for getting the word out with a blurb in Forbes and a citation in Briefing.com today!!!

07:46 ET Inter-Tel highlighted as a shorting opportunity in Forbes (INTL) 21.50: Forbes reports that Stephen Worthington of the Barbary Coast hedge fund warns people away from this provider of business telephone systems. According to article, nearly all of co's Q1 profit came from a nonrecurring $20 mln arbitration settlement. INTL is also said to have a troubling acquisition history and is now experiencing problems servicing some customers. "Short the stock and cover at $12."

forbes.com

Hang Up the Phone

INTER-TEL sells an array of business telephone systems, from phone trees to voice mail. Its larger competitors--Avaya, 3Com and Lucent--are losing money, but Inter-Tel (nasdaq: INTL - news - people ) in a rough 2001 posted a $13 million profit followed by a $15 million profit in 2002's first quarter. As a result, its stock has doubled over the past 12 months.

At $21, or 20 times earnings, the stock looks cheap. But Stephen Worthington of the Barbary Coast hedge fund warns people away. Nearly all of Inter-Tel's first-quarter profit came from a nonrecurring $20 million arbitration settlement. In addition, Inter-Tel has a troubling acquisition history that includes a $51 million charge last year for the assets of Executone Information Systems. Last year Inter-Tel gobbled up a piece of Convergent Technologies that is now causing indigestion. Convergent sells competitors' products and Inter-Tel is having a hard time servicing them. Meanwhile, sales are declining. Short the stock and cover at $12.