Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. T. who wrote (213069)	12/28/2001 10:55:05 AM
From: maried.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

What ridiculous statements! *I believe that is the best way to ensure freedom and liberty for women.* Who is often the first person to suggest abortion when a pregnancy is not planned? The man! "Hey, I said I'd pay for the abortion and she didn't want to have it. Now it's her problem." Gets him off the hook every time. That gives him freedom not her. And killing an unborn child ensures liberty for a women? Liberty...the condition of being free to choose, esp. as ways of acting or living, with an implication of wisdom and voluntary restraint....to go beyond the bounds of what is proper. A woman who chooses an abortion unless there are serious reasons to do so is not using wisdom or restraint. But she is going beyond the bounds of what is proper. *It's not nice, but dropping bombs on innocent children is not nice either, but it is necessary.* No one sets out to kill innocent children with bombs...an abortion is designed to kill an innocent child and it's not necessary! You are correct,though, when you say an abortion is certainly "not nice!" In fact, it's immoral and should again be illegal! Marie