Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: energyplay who wrote (12231)	12/29/2001 3:04:46 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

Hi Energyplay, Enron was creative, but, step back for a moment, appraise the situation fully, and note the similarities, then admit it, Uncle Greensput is even more so, fractal scaled up a trillion times. Maybe I am exaggerating just a little, and being alarmist just a bit more:0) msnbc.com Chugs, Jay

To: energyplay who wrote (12231)	1/2/2002 3:02:16 AM
From: Baldur Fjvlnisson	Respond to of 74559

I really think it would be a good idea for the SEC scam to answer the following questions and issue guidelines. All I want from this fraud driven mess and the so called "police" is a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD: 1. Which scams, semi-scams and other concept scams ALWAYS get away with ANYTHING in this fraud driven market. Do those scams have to buy a license from the SEC scam? 2. How many balance sheets should the owners of the SEC scam be allowed to use to defraud investors? 3. It's quite natural for the SEC scam to simply say that they didn't understand Enron. No big deal; it's only history's largest corporate bankruptcy BUT it would be nice to get an estimate on EXACTLY HOW MUCH of this totally fraud driven market the SEC scam does understand, if anything.