SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (15122)12/30/2001 2:01:41 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Don't definitions of terrorism need to exclude the parameters of nation states at war? There are always civilian casualties in war, doubly so in modern total wars.

Yep. But in the cases I cite, civilians are targets not "collateral damage".

Nadine, I've been meaning to ask you how you would categorize the incident I read about frequently in which I think it was Shamir, perhaps others, who bombed a hotel full of civilians (you can tell from my recounting that I probably don't even have the outlines correct) but I'm certain you know about the incident. It's the one in which, in these arguments about terrorism, the reply is that certain future Israeli leaders were terrorists.

John



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (15122)12/30/2001 3:51:34 PM
From: SirRealist  Respond to of 281500
 
As well, distinction should be drawn in defining an "innocent civilian". If much of the adult populace is supportive of an offensive war, where is the innocence?

It is different in some tyrannical states, where the citizenry may be cowed into acquiescence out of fear of their own leadership.

Utilizing your measure - that wars by nation-states are not terrorism - is a good starting point, commonly accepted. Even though they may provoke terror, and may be unlawful by world definition, nations at war are simply that, and there, some standards of civil behavior do apply that have been internationally recognized, such as treatment of POWs.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (15122)12/30/2001 6:36:48 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 281500
 
Ever heard about the Geneva convention, the one made after the US civil war, which was
particularly tough on civilians.

Ilmarinen