SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Imclone systems (IMCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RCMac who wrote (1755)12/30/2001 6:22:17 PM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 2515
 
I am obviously not a lawyer. but to have inside information is not in any way illegal. To trade on it is a violation of securities laws. But if the information is disclosed to the world, properly or improperly, an then traded on, was it still inside information at the time of the trades?

Monday when the market opens what advantage does the person who revealed this information to everyone have over you or I, assuming the information is correct?

Obviously we don't know if the information is correct or not.

I agree with you on this part: "unlike the corporation -- has no right unilaterally to make the info public, and he apparently breached his
obligations to the corporation in doing so."



To: RCMac who wrote (1755)12/30/2001 8:37:32 PM
From: aknahow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2515
 
my final comment on the legality or illegality involved . I I buy IMCL on the basis of the Yahoo post on Monday, am I guilty of inside trading? Clearly not. So if the person that posted trades can they be guilty of insider trading?