SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (1382)12/31/2001 10:36:13 AM
From: Scoobah  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32591
 
WAR spreading,

INDIA: WE WILL WIN NUCLEAR WAR December 31, 2001

The Times reports: “India boasted yesterday that it would survive a first strike by a Pakistani atomic weapon, but that its neighbor would be wiped out in a swift nuclear counter-attack.
As troop reinforcements continued to pour into the frontier zone, and tens of thousands of people fled border villages, the specter of all-out war between two nuclear powers prompted America and Britain to intervene directly…”

jvim.com



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (1382)12/31/2001 1:03:48 PM
From: Scoobah  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32591
 
Al Qaeda Loses Afghanistan – But Relocates

31 December: In a provisional summing up of the Afghan campaign, DEBKAfile’s military analysts find that the sixteen weeks of warfare have cost the al Qaeda terror organization the use of Afghan soil – and possibly Pakistan too - for its primary command centers, its specialized training facilities, its logistical infrastructure and its laboratories and facilities for the manufacture of explosives and substances of mass destruction.

Before October 7, 2001, these facilities operated freely around the country, welcome guests of the Taliban regime.

Heavy though these losses are, they have scarcely impaired the operational ability of the terror organization headed by Osama bin Laden and its far-flung tentacles.

DEBKAfile’s military analysts note at the outset of the war, al Qaeda’s fighting strength in the country consisted of no more than four to five thousand men. As the hostilities went on, the organization mustered another 12-15,000 “holy warriors” for the war against America, mainly from Pakistan’s religious seminaries and schools, the medressas. Most were Pakistanis; a few were foreign students.

In resisting the American-led campaign, Bin Laden’s legions confined themselves to three war arenas - the Konduz- Khanabad sector in the north, then Kandahar in the south, where they were mainly active in defending the international airport, and, finally, in the eastern mountains of Tora Bora.

In all three arenas, al Qaeda fighters put up little more than rearguard actions to allow the main body of their comrades to melt away to safety.

In all, the terrorist force lost between 400 and 600 hard core fighters, roughly 12-14 percent of the total Afghan contingent, killed either in those limited battles or in US aerial bombardments; 120-140, less than 3 percent, were taken prisoner.

Pakistani contingents guarding the frontier detained 200 fugitives, believed mostly al Qaeda, and handed them over for interrogation.

The remainder, 3,000-3,500 al Qaeda combatants, made it out of country before it fell under anti-Taliban rule via well-organized escape corridors, which US intelligence believes to have run across land, sea and air, to two destinations, South Tehran and the Gulf emirate of Abu Dhabi.

So how much damage has al Qaeda suffered by being driven out of Afghanistan?

According to DEBKAfile’s military and intelligence sources, its key loss its concentration of facilities for training groups of raw recruits combatants and terrorists.

However, the network’s capabilities for launching terror operations have not been affected, because most of its
operating infrastructure is scattered in places outside Afghanistan and was therefore untouched by the US war offensive.

Indeed the flow of trained Afghanistan-based fighting men to their new destinations has served to invigorate that largely covert and fragmented infrastructure.

Our sources reveal their main destinations:

Between 600 and 800 Saudi Arabians headed via Abu Dhabi or Yemen back into the kingdom, branching off in different directions.

One group fetched up on the northern fringes of the Empty Quarter bordering the Eastern Provinces, another in the southern province of Asir on the Yemeni frontier; a third in the two holy cities of Mecca and Medina on the Red Sea shore and a last group reached the town of Braide in the Nejd region north of Riyadh.

The next group of 800 to 1000 escapees arrived in Yemen – some making for the Husoun tribal region of Marib in the north, and others for Hadhramauth.

Some 800 al Qaeda fighters were dropped in Somalia, one batch hiding in the shanty hunts around Baidoa, a second trucked to the Somali-Kenyan frontier. Two or three Somali warlords in opposition to the transitional government claim that al Qaeda maintains three big bases near Mogadishu and have offered America help in driving them out.

DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources dismiss the claim as an attempt to cash in on America’s campaign against terror to acquire new weaponry and settle accounts with rivals

A further 700-900 al Qaeda militants were able to steal across Afghanistan’s northern borders and have been sighted in Kyrgistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Chechnya.

Finally, small squads – some 60 to 80 in all – found safe havens in Lebanon, Cyprus, Albania, Kosovo, Bosnia and Algeria.
___________________________________



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (1382)12/31/2001 1:13:38 PM
From: Scoobah  Respond to of 32591
 
Meanwhile, back at the front:

What New Israeli Labor Leader, Defense Minister Ben Eliezer,
Will Hear in Washington

31 December: The Israeli Labor Party’s newly elected chairman, Binyamin Ben Eliezer, defense minister in Ariel Sharon’s national unity lineup, has been invited to Washington on February 6.

He can expect to be received by President George W. Bush and conduct working sessions with defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other senior administration members.

While there, DEBKAfile’s Washington sources report, Ben Eliezer may find he has traveled a long way to confront the dilemmas he ducked at home in the euphoria of victory.

Since his election last week, the defense minister has loosed a stream of contradictory statements to the media, announcing this and that minister and this and that party functionary will be fired or retained.

He has also been busy fielding demands from the dovish wing of his party to quit the Sharon government, which he was invited to join for his hawkish views.

They want him to take time out to frame an urgently needed new party agenda.

Labor’s constituents have vanished in droves since the 1993 Oslo peace accords its leaders negotiated were swept away by the current Palestinian uprising.

The party needs to reinvent itself urgently if it wants to survive.

But giving up the defense ministry is the last thing Ben Eliezer wants to do. Even in the government, he must somehow co-exist with the back-to-Oslo initiatives of his fellow Laborite, senior statesman and foreign minister Shimon Peres, and his frequent plunges into dialogue with Palestinian leaders, in violation of the Sharon government’s edicts.

Because he wants to stay in with Sharon without antagonizing Peres, Ben Eliezer is constantly on the hop around conflicting pressures.

To win the foreign minister’s support for his candidacy, Ben Eliezer backed up his current round of talks with Palestinian legislature Speaker Ahmed Qureia, known as Abu Ala, despite Sharon’s disapproval.

Peres wants the defense minister to affirm that Palestinian violence has diminished sufficiently to return to diplomatic negotiations and release Arafat from his virtual house arrest in Ramallah.

The Palestinians are clamoring for US envoy Anthony Zinni to pick up his interrupted mission to the region and Peres is echoing this demand.

In Washington, however, the defense minister will be pulled up very short by a different set of pressures.

The war America has declared on terrorism is inching closer and closer to the Middle East. The Bush administration is counting on Ariel Sharon for a firm hand at Israel’s helm.

The new Labor leader will be strongly advised not to rock the government boat in Jerusalem, whatever this or that Labor faction may want. Instead he will be expected to render the national unity government every possible support.

According to IDF statistics released Sunday night, the rate of Palestinian terrorist attacks has fallen by almost half – from 300 in the first half of November, to 170 in the first half of December. For Sharon that is not good enough.

Shortly before the figure was released, three Palestinians were killed while attempting to force their way into the Israeli settlement of Elei Sinai in the Gaza Strip.

Since Arafat’s speech on December 16 ordering a halt to terrorist violence inside Israel, especially suicide strikes, Israeli security and military forces have thwarted 16 Palestinian terror attacks, of which 8 were attempted suicide strikes.

Arafat and the Palestinian Authority, say Israeli intelligence sources, do not deserve to be credited with Israel’s successful preventive operations.

The Hamas is as free as it ever was to carry out terrorist attacks against Israeli targets in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, while the Jihad Islami recognizes no restraints whatever.

The Israeli defense minister will find that Washington accepts the Sharon – not the Peres – reading.

Unlike European leaders, the key members of the Bush team have little patience with the foreign minister’s dance around Palestinian leaders.

Abu Ala is regarded as a spent force both in and outside the Palestinian leadership and his meetings with Peres deemed essentially aimless.

Zinni will be sent back to the region when its suits the Bush administration. He will certainly not be assigned with promoting US relations with Arafat, who has lost all standing in Washington - particularly when he is snubbed even by his closest ally, Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak, who refuses to see him.

Zinni’s first mission to the region was less to do with the Israel-Palestinian conflict and more about preparations for the coming US military moves in the Middle East.

If he returns, it will be to carry on where he left off before.

The Israeli defense minister ought therefore to return home wiser, calmer, less liable to zigzag round conflicting pressures and more inclined to focus on the daunting tasks ahead of Israel and its government. The most realistic way for him to build up his power base and national reputation will be to sit still, keep his nose to the grindstone and bide his time.



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (1382)12/31/2001 2:05:07 PM
From: Scoobah  Respond to of 32591
 
Peres: U.S. pressure on Syria 'only the beginning'

Foreign Minister Shimon Peres said Monday that he believed that recent U.S. pressure on Syria to abandon its hosting of terrorist organizations was "only the beginning."

Reacting to Israeli media accounts that Israel had made fresh overtures to Syria, Peres told Israel Radio that the reports were "more sensationalist than profound." He declined to respond directly to a Ma'ariv daily report Monday that a planned meeting between Peres and Syrian Defense Minister Mustafa Tlass was cancelled at the last minute.

Of U.S. efforts to press Syria to stop its tacit sponsorship of organizations linked to terrorism, Peres said "Syria is still living under the illusion that there is a difference between 'good terrorism' and 'bad terrorism.' This is nonsense. But there is not one institution in the world that will agree that for the sake of some goal one may murder youths, women, and children. This is not terrorism, this is murder. These are not, as people once said, guerrillas or the resistance, this is murder."

"America has begun to pressure Syria, and I don't believe that this is over yet. This is only the beginning. And it may take some time until Syria feels under pressure and begins to understand that this is a new world."

Peres turned aside reports that Israel and Syria were close to renewing peace talks. He said Syria was demanding that any talks be undertaken from the point at which they were halted during the premiership of Ehud Barak. Only "when we accept all their pre-conditions" would Damascus agree to a renewal of the talks.

Sources close to previous rounds of the talks have said that Syria was close to agreeing to a full peace treaty in exchange for return of the Golan Heights, captured from Damascus in the 1967 Six Day War. But the negotiations ultimately foundered, apparently in a dispute over some 200 meters of land on the shore of the Kinneret.

"Our position is very clear. We are saying that we are prepared to enter into negatiations without pre-conditions on the basis of (UN Security Council Resolutions) 242 and 338." The two resolutions call for return of occupied territory. Arabs maintain that the wording of the resolutions calls for return of all captured land, while Israel insists that the text only mandates the return of some of the land.

Peres: Palestinians no longer have terror option
Peres added that in the world climate following the September 11 attacks, "the Palestinians no longer have any option to return to terrorism, because they are more dependent on the world than perhaps any other body. Both for financial aid and for political aid."

"It's clear that we live in a triangle, not just as a couple. Not only we and the Palestinians, but the Palestinians, we, and the entire world," Peres said.

Regarding EU curbs against Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad groups, he said, "Even the European world has decided that it will no longer compromise with terrorism."

Peres spoke after meeting Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to discuss the foreign minister's contacts with senior Palestinian official Abu Ala. The talks have aroused controversy, with Israeli hawks demanding Peres be sacked for conducting "peace negotiations under fire" contrary to cabinet pledges to refrain from all such talks.

But Peres said that "We have decided that we are conducting negotiations toward a cease-fire, talks which I call 'rich negotiations', because cease-fire talks certainly have a diplomatic element, and not only a military element."

Peres said the world's attitude meant that, "Those who say the Palestinians haven't changed, should look at the world and understand that the world has changed. We live in a completely different world."



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (1382)1/2/2002 5:08:45 AM
From: Scoobah  Respond to of 32591
 
DEBKAfile’s Exclusive Military Sources:

US Sends Israel Vaccinations and Antidotes

2 January: A US Sixth Fleet ship docked in Haifa two weeks ago carrying counter-measures for nuclear warfare, especially highly radioactive “dirty bombs”, as well as vaccines and antidotes to counter biological and poison gas contamination, such as anthrax and smallpox.

The transfer was made as part of US military
preparations in the region. It is an indicator that a US strike against Saddam Hussein may be contemplated in Washington in the short run and that protective measures for Israelis, as well as American forces in the region, have been lined up for the contingency of an Iraqi counter-strike.

DEBKAfile’s sources add that the defense authorities decided to leave the freight aboard the US vessel for the moment - firstly, so as not to alert the public to US war preparations in the region; second, to give the authorities time to arrange a high-security, insulated storage facility for a sizeable quantity of anti-toxin materials and equipment.

Private facilities are being sought in the center of the country, as existing military installations are not up to scratch.

Tuesday, January 1, Israeli defense minister Binyamin Ben Eliezer accompanied by top defense officials visited the Ness Ziona biological institute to confer on preparations - reported in Haaretz - for a possible Iraqi chemical or biological strike.

The LondonTimes reports Wednesday, January 2, the conviction of Israeli intelligence that Palestinian bomb-makers have begun mixing toxic substances in the explosives used in their suicide attacks.

The suicide bomber who blew himself up last month near the Jerusalem David Citadel hotel where two cabinet ministers were holding meetings carried a bomb laced with lethal pesticides.

The architects of this new generation of bombs are believed to be Jassar Samaro and Naseen Abu Rus, who were trained by the Lebanese terror group, the Hizballah, and work out of a secret laboratory at the al Najah University of Nablus.

DEBKAfile was the first publication to report the collaboration deal agreed last year between Yasser Arafat and Hizballah to enhance Palestinian terror capabilities.

The same two Palestinian bomb manufacturers are also thought to have made the shoe bomb used by Richard Reid to try and blow up an American Airlines plane bound from Paris to Miami just before Christmas.