SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: herb will who wrote (66717)12/31/2001 9:35:41 AM
From: combjellyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
"but I can’t see anything that would show that there is large scale dumping of P 4’s."

Didn't mean to imply that I thought that to be the case. What I wanted to point out was that AMD gets a significant premium over the P4 at the same clock rate. As your table points out, AMD even gets a premium over Intel when you compare ModelHertz to frequency, something that if it was suggested in October would have been hooted down in derision, and rightly so. It is significant that the pricing has more or less stuck, which implies that the OEMs are paying equivalently high prices. The gray market is fed by OEMs dumping excess stock, and it would not surprise me if there was a big delta between the gray market price and the OEM price, that some would buy more than they need and sell it on the gray market for the quick profit. Since pricing has been stable either the delta doesn't exist, or the demand is so high that the units get soaked up immediately. It does not mean the dealers cannot sell them, these people don't hold anything for more than a few days to a week. The margins are low enough that they need to turn products quickly.

As far as the difference between the PriceWatch pricing and AMD's and Intel's volume pricing, all it means is that AMD's sales people have more flexibility in setting the pricing. Not like that is news...