Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (213705)	1/1/2002 7:09:11 PM
From: gao seng	Respond to of 769670

Pointless discussing issues with morons like you. But anyway. The discussion was based on whether or not the world was created. In other words, how did the world come to be. And the discussion was based on evidence, both scientific and deductive. Your response implied that deduction is not admissible into the discussion. I said that is untrue, and you responded that religion begins where reason leaves off. I ask you, is that what we were discussing? I think not. Your response to a question about if reason is admissible into a discussion of how the world came to be with you as evidence, is that religion begins where reason ends? Pretty pathetic, lame, and desperate response, I think. Anyway, I ask again, in determining the origins of the universe, is it ok to allow deductive evidence into your little world?