Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (213788)	1/1/2002 11:05:08 PM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Lol, Lazarus Long not only is a liberal, he fights like one as well. LL, how do you come by your belief that the world was not created. How do you then take that belief, and associate it to the absolute truths that this country was founded on?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (213788)	1/1/2002 11:05:54 PM
From: Carl Shaw	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Dammit!!..Now we have to start build a church, atheist preacher colleges, etc...I think I'm gonna find a new religion!!Any suggestions??

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (213788)	1/2/2002 9:21:19 AM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Report: Democrats to demonize conservative Christians as being like Taliban... Link and headline from drudgereport.com Demonizing Christians Democrats, in the name of tolerance, plan to demonize conservative Christians as being like the Taliban, according to an article in Newsweek. Democrats "are planning a daring assault on the most critical turf in politics: the cultural mainstream," political correspondent Howard Fineman writes. "The theory goes like this. Our enemy in Afghanistan is religious extremism and intolerance. It's therefore more important than ever to honor the ideals of tolerance — religious, sexual, racial, reproductive — at home. The GOP is out of the mainstream, some Democrats will argue [this] year, because it's too dependent upon an intolerant 'religious right,'" Mr. Fineman said. "This is an incendiary battle plan — essentially comparing the GOP right with the Taliban — designed to draw an outraged response from the president. Then Democrats would have Bush just where they wanted him: in a firefight at home." The 'religious right' This probably won't come as a surprise to anyone, but the New York Times appears to be working off the same page as the Democratic Party. In a front-page story Thursday, the newspaper referred to Islamic radicals as "the religious right." Foreign correspondent Douglas Jehl, in an article on how the Saudi royal family has dealt with radical Islam, said: "Choosing accommodation over confrontation, the government shied away from a crackdown on militant clerics or their followers, a move that would have inflamed the religious right, the disaffected returnees from other wars [besides the one in Afghanistan] and a growing number of the unemployed." washtimes.com Well, Long, which side are you on? And btw, I never said that being an atheist prohibits one from being a conservative. From what little posts of yours I have seen, I think you are a liberal, though.