Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greg s who wrote (153630)	1/3/2002 1:51:52 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 186894

re: Someone who likes Pat Buchanan I suspect to be limited and should be limited in his posting I don't know if this is true or not and further, I do not care, as it has absolutely nothing to do with INTC. I DO care that everyone's right to free speech be upheld, even those who I may disagree with. I don't disagree. My problem with jimbo is that he stated I should be banned for posting a YHOO link re P. Buchanan. That link was posted to someone else and was part of an exchange we were having in which jimbo had no involvement. For those that don't know jimbo well, that's typical MO for him....stealth sniping...come in, drops a load and then splits. And its his most recent attempt to censor my posts. It gotten old. Its not uncommon on these threads for people to disagree. Either you argue the issue out or you give it up. In jimbo's case, however, if he can't 'win', he doesn't take his toys and goes home.......instead he does his stealth sniping trick, and if that doesn't work, he threatens. After his latest post in which he wanted me banned from SI for posting a link, I chose not to ignore him anymore but rather to encourage him to discuss the issue. Instead, he blew me off. That led to my posting response to his Intel post. Next stop is SI administration. ted