SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam Bose who wrote (168250)1/3/2002 2:15:49 PM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Sam, RE: The J.P. Morgan upgrade of INTC sure helping the Nasdaq; wonder if Dan Niles' institutional clients are getting a little bit fed up with him! Niles, as recently as yesterday, was bearish on INTC, at 33....he was also bearish at 30....bearish at 25....and bearish at 18. That's why he gets paid a few million a year.

Dan's institutional clients don't care what his opinions are. They pay commissions to Lehman for Dan's data.



To: Sam Bose who wrote (168250)1/3/2002 3:01:51 PM
From: BWAC  Respond to of 176387
 
Who is this Done Nil guy? Is he kin to Asshock Doomar? They kinda look alike to me. Damn financial terrorists.



To: Sam Bose who wrote (168250)1/3/2002 4:42:43 PM
From: kemble s. matter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Sam,
Hi!!

HAPPY NEW YEAR to you and your dad Sam...Certainly appears is if it will be a better year...The 11 cuts and the stimulus (no matter who is supposedly benefits) will help...
RE: The J.P. Morgan upgrade of INTC sure helping the Nasdaq; wonder if Dan Niles' institutional clients are getting a little bit fed up with him! Niles, as recently as yesterday, was bearish on INTC, at 33....he was also bearish at 30....bearish at 25....and bearish at 18. That's why he gets paid a few million a year.

Yes, Dan has been very accurate on some accounts and according to some he may have had connections from past friends...But, I have never felt he pushed the long term picture...And, yes, he has been off as much as he has been on...I guess the question you are posing is: "Why would he be bearish at the bottom?" :o)

Best, Kemble