SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TREND1 who wrote (18285)1/3/2002 11:14:15 PM
From: Trumptown  Respond to of 99280
 
But, but,,what would the old HAL be saying now?? We liked the old HAL...

Haven't you ever heard:

"good enough is perfect"

"better is the enemy of good"

SR



To: TREND1 who wrote (18285)1/4/2002 3:01:10 AM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 99280
 
<<Eugene
The old Hal got whipsawed.
Hal is thankful to Zeev and Alex for showing these past errors.
The New Hal will just wait for another Oct 1998, April 2001, and
Sep 2001 when the Fed Model was under valued.
Had a chart of Fed Model on my web site.
Maybe you would like to see it again?

Larry Dudash>> Patience is Golden.PaxMax



To: TREND1 who wrote (18285)1/4/2002 7:04:59 AM
From: Rich1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
So Larry you are happy waiting every couple years to make your play..Sounds like a good plan..
Do you know when else prior to October 98 the Fed Model was undervalued..



To: TREND1 who wrote (18285)1/4/2002 7:16:28 AM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Will u buy if the fed model says stocked are undervalued by .5% ? Would u then sell later if they were overvalued by .5% ?

I do like the concept of few but effective buy signals though. Good trading can have better results, but it takes work. And investing is supposed to be an alternative to work right? <g>