Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: isopatch who wrote (26977)	1/4/2002 10:01:50 AM
From: Paul Shread	Respond to of 52237

Iso, Yup, price sure is the final arbiter, but AJC just gave three days' notice that a pullback may be coming. -g- Golds are having a heckuva day for some reason; haven't waded into HGMCW yet, but am starting to think I should. Looks like EPEX at 5 was a bargin the other day... Paul

To: isopatch who wrote (26977)	1/4/2002 11:24:49 AM
From: chowder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 52237

Good Morning Mr Patch! Interesting comment ... >> As long as so many people continue to fight the Fed and the tape, the primary trend will remain up. And I don't trade against the primary trend. << For most of 2001, the FED and the tape headed in opposite directions. The FED kept pumping and the market kept falling. How do you explain not fighting the FED and the tape? When the FED and the tape finally started heading in the same direction, your calls were opposite of the trend. On October 30th, after the market had already bottomed and started up, you were calling to short the market and the PPT. Your comment: << the PPT and the manipulators WILL lose and the markets AND the giant debt pyramid that's been building for decades WILL completely collapse sending us into am absolutely tremendous depression. << Collapse? The market went on to have the best seven week performance in over 20 years according to Financial Times. You missed out on a nearly 50% upside. How do you explain this? In the same post you said, >> Methinks they see the $350 to $400 gold level over the next few months as an economic "goal line stand" for the American Empire. << Gold to $350 to $400 level? Message 16580568 In looking at this chart, you made the call at $290 for gold. Looks like it went straight down from there. stockcharts.com[h,a]declyiay[d20001004,20020104][pf][vc60][iut] It would be nice to see a little honesty for a change, as opposed to knocking other threadsters for the same things you're guilty of. You simply made some bad calls of late. dabum