Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rich4eagle who wrote (214718)	1/4/2002 1:30:20 PM
From: Mana	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

If they made more money the tax burden would be more balanced. Must have something to do with excessive corporate executive compensations while they lose money and lay off good hard working Americans. If the government would cut spending and go to a fair flat tax, the economy would boom. Then companies would not have to lay off good hard working Americans. I don't like the fact that a lot of execs have golden parachutes. However, lay offs are a end result to pork spending. I am more angry at Congress than corporate executives. Pork spending----->more money needed----->increase in taxes--->less money flowing into economy----->economy falters------->Corporations don't make earnings---->Corporations try to save money by cutting jobs You like my diagram? I might have missed a step or 2 but you get the idea. -Mana