SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ThirdEye who wrote (15532)1/4/2002 5:23:33 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
The F.B.I. may already have talked to the killer. There are not that many people with the access to germs, the knowledge and an anthrax vaccine booster shot in the last year. But the murderer showed a knowledge of forensics (apparently not licking a stamp or envelope, for example, to avoid leaving DNA), and it may be very difficult to move from suspicions to sufficient proof for an arrest.

Forget about forensics for just a moment. If you had just stuffed an envelope full with weapons grade anthrax...would you lick it?

jttmab



To: ThirdEye who wrote (15532)1/5/2002 8:51:18 AM
From: SirRealist  Respond to of 281500
 
And still no mention of the fact that the envelopes were sent to liberal Dems....

The rest of the article makes perfect sense. But why these targets?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News