To: AllansAlias who wrote (26793 ) 1/5/2002 12:00:55 PM From: JRI Respond to of 209892 Nice post. Just spoke with another daddy at the park; Get a lot of my antedoctal information this way nowadays.....he is involved in high-end real estate projects for the last 15 years...although he said business is bad, he mentioned that many developers have not gone as hog wild as (going into last recessions), and that they learned some lessons (less inventory, less debt)....I've heard this from several in the industry, many who were around in '90 and survived.....we'll see about that, but I'll hold open the possibility that real estate is in better-even if still bad- shape then in the last downturn. Like you, however, corporate, personal, and government balance sheets are bad (in most cases) and getting worse, and I haven't yet seen a coherent argument that says they are getting better. Indeed, unlike past recession, all seem to be delaying recovery (and making the downturn/bottom worse and prolonged) by piling on more debt/looser terms at the time in the cycle in which debt usually gets pared. In this respect, Argentina (and Japan for that matter) has taught us nothing, apparently. RE: Liquidity pump. Something I would love to get my hands better around...certainly, this thread has tried thru monitoring of daily Fed injections, etc. But as fall '99-early '00 shows, the ridiculous can get even more so "with a little help from their friends". I have no desire to be bear meat in such a scenario, but as you have said often, great opportunity awaits here for the patient bear. (One wild, brainstorming thought: I wonder if you pump enough, can wave counts perhaps get skewed/screwed up? The equivilent of the deck being stacked against a skilled poker player ("how do I keep losing?"). Perhaps could explain EDs, and the length of this 4? Perhaps waves work best in "normal" market conditions-whatever they are) Likely, over the next couple weeks, I will short extremes (like yesterday morn) and cover fairly quick until we get some clear breakdown/down channel going. Apparently, last time 200/50 moving averages were so close together was Sept. 2000..hmmm.. Of course, gap down and follow-thru Monday could put in a nice reversal, but I am thinking late Jan/early Feb. now..