SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jim_p who wrote (5901)1/6/2002 10:44:26 AM
From: AV8R  Respond to of 206328
 
Great comments on HAL Jim, thanks.



To: jim_p who wrote (5901)1/6/2002 11:24:51 AM
From: excardog  Respond to of 206328
 
HAL could do a subsidiary bk filing on Dresser ala MDR. Probably not such a bad idea imo. I think HAL is probably fun to trade but I'll watch you and get my kicks that way.

All the reasons you state on HAL I've heard before but as we both know most of the time the market reacts on emotion.

The most encouraging item in what you list is tort reform and with 2000 +/- companies exposed to asbestos litigation it will happen eventually but it's the time in between that has me concerned.

Now can I have the keys to the new Jag dad.

Scott



To: jim_p who wrote (5901)1/6/2002 12:41:03 PM
From: aerosappy  Respond to of 206328
 
jim_p -- HAL litigation.

Regarding the suits against HAL subsidiaries, this link might be interesting (even though it relates to USG):
boards.fool.com

While HAL and MDR are not among the case studies, there may be some useful tidbits.