Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (110318)	1/6/2002 10:41:22 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

but i don't think that discussion is too relevant. PS. by "relevant", i mean that i have brought up here and elsewhere some valuation issues* (some dealing with qcom, some with the broader market). so if somebody wants to debate some of those topics, that is fine by me (so far, there haven't been many takers). but i'd rather not get sidetracked into discussions about newsletters and such (or spelling of proper names, which is one of the notable areas of expertise of another thread). * forgive me if i backed up some of my arguments with historical facts...some astute observers have pointed out that a consideration of facts is "looking in the rear-view mirror"; certainly, the rear-view mirror is not the most important set of facts out there: i would much prefer to back up my arguments with facts taken from the future, but i have yet to find a good newsletter source for that subset of reality.