SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Sladek who wrote (25778)1/6/2002 2:13:47 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Respond to of 26163
 
That's the way I understand it, as well. I'm just unable to get worked up about it as a "free speech" issue. In the BW vs. Webnode case, we faced a related situation—BW's attorneys wanted our emails relating to that particular event. We were always cooperative and straightforward with them so it was done on "the honour system" rather than requiring a motion to compel.

In retrospect, it was painfully boring stuff—a three day email discussion dissecting the comedic merits of "MonkeyBizness Wire" vs. "Buy-A-Sense-of-Humour Wire". (Well, 'this' word is funnier than 'that' word because…) Maybe we should have made them go get it with a motion, after all.



To: John Sladek who wrote (25778)1/8/2002 9:40:42 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
In all fairness, I doubt Dave has been in touch with Pugs during the time period covered by the Order, though of course there may be some older stuff still on the computers.

But the communications would have had to have had something to do with Marchese for them to be used in the case.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News