Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Razorbak who wrote (5920)	1/6/2002 8:21:18 PM
From: GREENLAW4-7	Respond to of 206325

I am strictly a Criminal Defense Litigator, and do some PI, and Chapter 7. I have a small firm w/ my brother, and O I prefer to trade then practice! LOL I have not seen the case, and heard of it in several articles, and through Hal IR. Its important that everyone understand that I only have a distant OPINION, and I have no PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE of up coming events that could hamper the stock. I had alway know about the Asbestos even back a year ago. I felt the stock reflected the liability when it fell from 45 to 28. It was then that I started to wonder why HAL was not bouncing back when OSX had small rally. Then she went from 19-27, then back to 20 again. I almost bought but noticed she was not moving up w/ OSX. HAL use to move in tandem w/ SLb, and BHI. Then I watched her get clobbered that friday, and bought at 11.change and sold 2 days later at 13.90. If anyone wants more info on liability they should call HAL! One thing I do want to say, if they win kust 1 of their recent cases..in a small award...HAL could bounce to 18-22 in days!! The same could be true the other way..