SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (67323)1/7/2002 4:22:00 PM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
> Maybe Intel will be able to pull out a
> 2.4G, but it must be a stretch

Don't you think that this is an exaggeration? I mean, are you comfortable knowing that lots of people just bookmarked your post there?

I know that it is not a scientifically valid point (but it lends mild credence, imho), but several of the reviews stated that the Northwood is miserably easy to overclock with air cooling, and that its clock reaches frequencies well over 2.40GHz.

-JC



To: Ali Chen who wrote (67323)1/7/2002 6:44:32 PM
From: Win SmithRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
I'm most curious about availability. It's hard to say why, but the 1.2ghz celeron, the first tualatin based version, was introduced Oct. 3, and 3 months later it only has 20-odd entries on pricewatch. The recently announced 1.3 celery has 0 entries. The 1.26 ghz piii Tualatin has 10 entries. All very odd, or not, for the "yields are ramp, fine is great" guys. If the "flood" of 50mm2 .13um celeries hasn't quite materialized after 3 months, it might possibly be a while before the piv tsunami shows up.

My favorite story from today was at the Inquirer, where Bosnian hardware guru Fuad Abazovic ran a 2.0ghz Northwood SDRAM system against a venerable old 1.4ghz DDR t-bird, and the Northwood got smoked. Really badly, for the most part. theinquirer.net .



To: Ali Chen who wrote (67323)1/7/2002 8:27:51 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: Northwood has 69C max case T, and 17A of quiescent current.

Uh-Oh!

Thanks for link.

That works out to what, 25w power consumption in standby? It is going to present an "interesting" challenge for notebook designers. If they take voltage down to 1.1 for the mobile .13 processor (likely), they'll still be closer to 20 watts than 15.

AMD seems to be just a smidgen better at 0.66A typical and 1.54A max. 2.25 watts on standby from a .18 1.5v mobile processor.

No wonder why AMD is so happy about their prospects for mobile and high density corporate and workstation/server solutions.

(page 43)
amd.com