Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (215554)	1/7/2002 5:40:26 PM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Well, I prefer NATO over the UN. The UN is clearly anti-Semitic and anti-Democratic. But, NATO can not replace the UN. How does NATO help against Iraq? You provided good solid reasons for the need for NATO. If these reasons disappear, then, why should we need NATO and the UN? Since NATO can't replace the UN, the logical thing would be for the UN to replace NATO. Or, are you saying that the EU is a threat to us? If so, are you saying economic, or military? An economic threat, well, isn't that competitive?