SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RR who wrote (45936)1/8/2002 12:40:20 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Green Berets outfought, outthought the Taliban

usatoday.com



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/8/2002 12:40:26 AM
From: BirdDog  Respond to of 65232
 
VBG...... V...V...VBG

Oh BTW: I'ts 39 degrees out tonight. Westerly warm wind. Feels great.

BirdDog@OhHomeOnTheRange.com



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/8/2002 12:41:32 AM
From: Dealer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
Goodevening RR! With your new weather station.....I can be assured that I will be getting accurate reports. :-)

It has to be better than the reports I have been getting from Yahoo and the Weather site....for the last month.

Still want ya to send me some snow.

dealie



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/8/2002 5:54:08 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
BEAS -- Growth That Doesn't Quit

By Alfred Chuang
Fast Company
January 2002

This article has some interesting information about their India and China markets as well as their use of Indian developers.

fastcompany.com



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/9/2002 11:53:12 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Here's a nice summary of one trader's view of the market in 2002...

Message 16880354

Message 16880357



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/10/2002 8:53:01 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
7:52AM Veritas Software (VRTS) 47.14: SG Cowen is positive on VRTS due to evidence of improving demand and a solid Q4; there is also evidence that storage software is becoming more of an IT priority, which bodes well for 2002. Firm raises Q4 rev/EPS ests to $360 mln/$0.14 from $355 mln/$0.13 and FY02 to $1.65 bln/$0.70 from $1.60 bln/$0.65, maintains Strong Buy rating; believes stock will trade in a range between $35 and $55.



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/10/2002 5:15:51 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
A quote for the day...

' When every physical and mental resource is focused, one’s power to solve a problem multiplies tremendously.'

-Norman Vincent Peale



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/10/2002 6:22:36 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
WSJ.COM: Expect More Airport Security Starting Next Week

01/10/2002
Dow Jones News Services
(Copyright © 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
By Jane Costello
The Wall Street Journal Online

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Next week, travelers can expect to see additional airport-security measures, as the airlines face a deadline to begin screening all checked luggage for bombs.

But the airlines and the federal government have yet to announce an implementation strategy that won't leave passengers facing additional delays or flight cancellations. Beefed-up security following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks has already led to longer lines at the airports.

As it stands today, only a fraction of all bags checked by passengers are examined. But starting Jan. 18, the airlines will be expected to screen all checked luggage by deploying at least one, and possibly more, of four methods: explosive-detection machines, bomb-sniffing dogs, hand searches or matching bags with boarding passengers. Officials estimate there are more than 1 billion bags checked with airlines each year.

"The deadline will be met, we just don't know exactly what combination of tools will be used," says Michael Wascon, a spokesman for the Air Transport Authority, the airline industry trade group. "We need something that meets security objectives that doesn't sacrifice convenience and efficiency."

There are 161 certified Explosive Detection System machines installed at the nation's airports. Each machine is capable of handling approximately 250 bags an hour.

By Dec. 31, new federal guidelines stipulate that all bags will be required to be screened by these machines. In order to meet the demand, the Federal Aviation Administration estimates that a total of 2,200 EDS machines will need to be in place. But only two companies have been certified by the FAA to produce them, L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. (LLL) of New York and InVision Technologies Inc. (INVN) of Newark, Calif.

According to the FAA, the machines cost $1 million, and an additional $1 million to install. The FAA has a total security budget of $293 million for the fiscal year, which is far short of the amount needed to purchase 2,039 additional machines.

"That's all the money we have right now," says FAA spokeswoman Rebecca Trexler. "And that's for our entire security effort, not just the purchase of EDS machines."

The FAA is also in the process of increasing the number of bomb-sniffing dog teams assigned to U.S. airports. There are 190 teams in place, with an additional 90 scheduled for deployment this year. The FAA is starting a puppy-training program at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, where sporting dogs will be bred specifically for the purpose of becoming federal, albeit four-legged, employees.

Given that it isn't feasible for airline employees to search every checked bag by hand, industry observers say that the most likely solution to the screening dilemma will involve a 100% positive passenger bag match, which the airlines already do for international flights. Luggage won't be loaded onto planes unless it is matched to a passenger who has boarded, which would prevent someone from checking a bag containing explosives and then walking away.

But while bag-match may prove to be the cornerstone of the solution to meet the looming deadline, it isn't the most secure method to ensure that there isn't a bomb on board, since it's predicated on matching, not screening, checked luggage. Matching checked bags to passengers would have done nothing to prevent the Sept. 11 hijackings.

"Bag matching won't do anything to stop the new terrorists," says Michael Boyd, an aviation consultant from Evergreen, Colo. "These people have already demonstrated that they're willing to leave the world with their luggage."

Airline officials are optimistic that they will be able to meet the federal guidelines with a minimal effect on passengers.

"What's happening behind the scenes will be transparent to the customer," says US Airways spokesman, David Castleveter. "I don't believe passengers will experience any noticeable delays."

They're worried, nonetheless. Rob Albergotti, a business-development analyst from Houston, says he has had his carry-on bag searched on every flight he's taken since Sept. 11, and says he dreads that any new requirements could result in flight delays and missed connections.

"Obviously, if this genuinely improves security on the airlines then I am for it, but if history is any indication, it will be a complete disaster," he says. "If the government and the airlines do not get their act together and make it convenient for business travelers, more business trips will be canceled."

On Jan. 3, more than 50 American Airlines flights from Lambert International Airport in St. Louis were delayed when the airline conducted a test of its passenger bag match procedures.

But critics of the new airline security procedures warn that if Jan. 18 is a day like any other, it could be because nothing fundamental has changed behind the scenes.

"It could be a major mess, or it might be a media show," says Boyd. "But if nothing is different, you can be sure it's more window dressing than substance."

For continuously updated news from The Wall Street Journal, see WSJ.com at wsj.com.

(END) DOW JONES NEWS 01-10-02

06:17 PM



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/10/2002 11:33:42 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Hey RR: here's an good article on futures trading written by one of the well known futures traders...

futuresource.com



To: RR who wrote (45936)1/12/2002 6:09:36 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Business Jets Flying High

Reuters Finance News
Jan 12 7:20am ET

By Kathy Fieweger

CHICAGO (Reuters) - It may be the ultimate luxury. Call up with a few hours notice. Drive to a nearby airport 10 minutes before takeoff. Avoid all lines. Hop on board your well-appointed personal jet and fly off.

Whether the agenda is the midday meeting across the country or dropping in for an Aspen ski vacation, owning your own business jet, or at least part of one, is de rigueur.

The market? Corporate executives, celebrities, professional athletes and wealthy individuals afraid of flying on commercial airlines or just fed up with hassles and outrageous fares.

Interest in business jets has risen dramatically since the Sept. 11 attacks in New York and Washington. Business jet operators and manufacturers are betting an expanding range of customers are ready for this form of travel, weak economy or not.

The business jet market more than tripled in value between 1995 and 2000, according to Richard Aboulafia, analyst at aviation consulting firm Teal Group, and is now much larger than the combat aircraft industry. He predicts that, over the next 10 years, nearly 7,000 business jets will be produced worth $95 billion in 2001 dollars.

Strong corporate profits in the late 1990s drew companies to business jets as they sought travel efficiencies. Since Sept. 11, security and convenience became added considerations.

"Prior to last September, a good many of these same individuals would have hesitated to rely on private aircraft, reasoning that a larger plane must be safer," said the Robb Report, a magazine devoted to "the luxury lifestyle." The publisher recently put out a 152-page issue dedicated to private air travel. The tag line: safer, faster, smarter.

NAME YOUR PRICE

The growing sector is divided into three segments: charter, fractional shares and outright ownership of a plane.

There are many brands of small jets from a handful of manufacturers, each hoping for a piece of the expanding pie. The names include Cessna by Textron , Falcon by Dassault Aviation , Gulfstream by General Dynamics , Learjet and Challenger by Bombardier , Beechjet and Hawker by Raytheon . At the very upper range are Boeing Business Jet and the ACJ from Airbus, majority owned by European aerospace company EADS

The fractional market is currently the hottest segment, growing at 45 percent a year. It was pioneered in 1986 by Executive Jet when it created the NetJets fractional unit.

Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. , a company that has made fortunes for its shareholders by buying up other firms, bought Executive Jet in 1998, and others are seeking a way to hop on board.

Starting at about $150,000, a card entitling you to 25 hours worth of rides may be bought from an outfit called Marquis Jet Partners. The New York-based firm is carving up and reselling NetJets shares for a young, wealthy client base not ready to buy a whole share.

Despite the rising interest, Alan Clingman, chief executive of Marquis, cautioned that only NetJets makes money in the fractional arena. He expects to sell 1,000 travel cards a year.

"We believe that our market, which is half the number of hours (of a traditional share), is a potential 500,000 people," Clingman said. "It's enormous."

SOME CONSOLIDATION

Late in December, Raytheon's Travel Air announced plans to form a joint venture with privately held Flight Options Inc. of Cleveland to offer fractional shares.

Aboulafia said the partnership shows the intense pressure on all segments of the industry to achieve critical mass.

"They need to join forces to improve service and negotiate better terms from manufacturers and other suppliers," he said.

In addition to Flight Options and NetJets, players in the fractional share market also include Bombardier's FlexJets, Cessna CitationShares and, more recently, UAL Corp.'s Avolar, a sister company to No. 2 U.S. carrier United Airlines.

Stuart Oran, Avolar's president and chief executive, told Reuters he sees revenues of more than $400 million for his company in 2002 and more than $1 billion annually at the end of five years. Oran said there are only 3,000 fractional share owners right now, but a potential 300,000 industrywide.

"From our perspective, the market is huge today," Oran said. "We have no doubt that demand is many times in excess of what's been purchased to date. Demand will continue to outstrip supply. In reality, very few people know about this business."

For its part, Avolar intends to sell shares in 250 planes over the next five years. So far, 306 jets from four different manufacturers are on order.

NOT EXACTLY CHEAP

Avolar's prices begin at $434,700 per 1/16th share, entitling the buyer to 50 hours of flight time. That does not include the monthly management fees or actual costs of flying like fuel and maintenance. Prices for a bigger Gulfstream V are much more -- $2.8 million for a share and hourly fees from $5,000 to $6,000.

Despite the daunting cost of entry for travelers, the number of business jets in service continues to rise.

Boeing Business Jets, for example, expected orders for six airplanes per year at a base, unoutfitted cost of about $35 million each. Instead, more than 80 of their ultra high-end planes, derived from the 737 series, were ordered.

So how do you decide if the price is right? According to Executive Jet's NetJets fractional share unit, owning a share of a plane is most cost effective for those needing 50 to 400 hours of flying time per year.

Below 50 hours, charter is recommended. Buying a whole plane makes sense for more than 400 hours a year.

Open wallet. Get ready for takeoff.