SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: energyplay who wrote (11544)1/8/2002 4:39:25 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 23153
 
SOUND MONEY -- Consider This Deflation Scenario

Tuesday January 8, 9:17 am Eastern Time
BusinessWeek Online
Daily Briefing: SOUND MONEY
By Christopher Farrell

So what will the new year bring? After reading a number of reviews of 2001 and forecasts for 2002, a consensus has emerged among the Wall Street forecasting fraternity that could be summed up as ``better, but not great.''

Such a well-hedged, modestly upbeat prediction seems reasonable enough, especially considering all the uncertainty unleashed by September 11. Still, forecasting is a hazardous exercise, so it's always productive for business and investors to think about where the consensus could be wrong -- and in a big way.

So far, I haven't found the argument for a rapid return to a late 1990s-style boom particularly convincing. The risk that the U.S. economy sinks into Japanese-style stagnation is real, but the odds seem remote. I'd like to make the case that the big surprise in the next several years could be economic deflation.

LIMITED GROWTH. What are some implications of mild deflation? For one thing, greater U.S. consumer purchasing power as a dollar earned today would buy more goods and services. But the negative impact is far-reaching.

In an environment where markdowns are more common than price hikes, corporate profits suffer. A deflationary world is one of single-digit earnings growth and meager stock market returns. Business and individual bankruptcies could soar above already high levels as debt burdens become increasingly onerous. Federal policymakers would face sophisticated lobbying campaigns from industries seeking to block competition from efficient producers based in developing nations. Smart business execs would be wise to factor such a scenario into their planning.

Inflation typically declines during a downturn, and the current recession is no exception. The consumer price index [CPI] has dropped to less than a 2% annual rate from a high of 3.7% last spring. Retailers are slashing prices to lure consumers into shopping malls. The prices for retail goods excluding vehicles and gasoline are some 1% lower compared to a year ago, according to Mark Zandi, chief economist at the consulting firm Economy.com. Import prices, excluding energy, have fallen 5% during the downturn [10% if you include energy], paced by a 7% decline in prices for information-technology goods.

OTHER FORCES. The trend toward mild deflation is not just cyclical, however. Powerful structural shifts in the economy will keep the pressure on for lower prices even as a modest recovery unfolds. For one thing, prices keep falling rapidly in the technology area, and high tech makes up an ever-larger part of the U.S. economy. Also, the global economy is prone to excess capacity and supply of all kinds of goods, especially as emerging markets devote more resources toward building up export industries.

China's emergence as a giant low-cost producer following its formal admission to the World Trade Organization on Dec. 11 will put enormous downward pressure on prices, points out Edward Yardeni, chief investment strategist at Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown.

Deflation, not inflation, was the normal economic condition throughout U.S. history before World War II. America's wholesale price index essentially remained unchanged between 1790 and 1945. The underlying dynamic was toward mild deflation, punctuated by short bursts of virulent inflation [usually during war years] and debilitating bouts of severe deflation [typically during a downturn].

GRADUAL DECLINE. Indeed, inflation has been the modern disease. The CPI rose at an average annual rate of 4.1% from 1950 to 2000 -- steep enough to cut the value of a dollar by more than 75%. But inflation has gradually declined to an annual range of 2% to 3% in the past 15 years. The U.S. may be on the verge of a period in which stable to falling prices become as commonplace as rising prices were from the 1960s to the 1980s.

I don't want to raise too frightening a scenario here. Deflation is a forecast on the further-out margins of probability. The consensus view holds that the recession should end sometime during the first half of the year, and the scorekeepers at the National Bureau of Economic Research are expected to label it the mildest downturn of the past half century.

However, the subsequent expansion also is likely to be unusually muted for a post-World War II rebound. One reason: Because sales of big-ticket items such as homes and cars have remained strong during the recession, consumers have little pent-up demand. Another factor is that business investment in high-tech gear likely won't pick up until late in the year.

NEXT SURPRISE? The stock market should show a modest gain, a welcome respite from the losses of the past two years. As the economy improves, interest rates probably will increase slightly, as will the inflation rate. The Fed could start tightening monetary policy once the unemployment rate begins trending lower after peaking at 6.2% to 6.5%.

The great unknown in any economic forecast for 2002 is the horrendous possibility of another major terrorist attack against Americans. But if a major economic surprise is in store over the next several years, it could be how the U.S. went from half a century of worrying about inflation to figuring out how to cope with widespread deflation.

Go to www.businessweek.com to see all of our latest stories.



To: energyplay who wrote (11544)1/17/2002 8:35:22 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 23153
 
Some Good Energy Articles In Technology Review...

techreview.com



To: energyplay who wrote (11544)3/11/2002 4:20:46 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 23153
 
STRENGTHENING U.S. ECONOMY WILL BOOST ENERGY DEMAND - BUT BY HOW MUCH?

Mar 11, 2002 (Petroleum Finance Week/PBI Media via COMTEX) -- Recently revised economic figures suggest that the much-ballyhooed U.S. recession was never really a recession at all. But while energy demand obviously benefits from economic strength, it's difficult to predict what impact this news may have on the sector, oil patch economists say.

The news that has economists rethinking the recession is a revised GDP figure that shows 1.4 percent growth in the fourth quarter of 2001, rather than the original estimate of 0.2 percent growth. Bank One - in a research note headlined "The Recession That Wasn't?" - marveled over the growth figures.

"Instead of asking why this economy is so weak, we should all stand in amazement that the U.S. economy weathered the worst inventory bubble in its history, and the extraordinary events of Sept. 11, and was still able to produce growth," wrote Diane Swonk, the Chicago bank's chief economist.

Sarah Emerson, managing director of Energy Security Analysis Inc. in Boston, said that she expects the United States will eventually reach a 3 to 3.5 percent annual economic growth rate, and the rest of the world could reach that figure sometime afterward. At that level of economic growth, global oil demand growth could be expected to rise by approximately 1.75 percent, she suggested.

"That gets you back sometime in 2003 to a growth rate that isn't necessarily the highs of the mid-'90s, but is a fairly sustainable and healthy growth rate," Emerson told Petroleum Finance Week. "The problem is it's easy to make assumptions about the 2003 and beyond period, but we still have this sort of transition year which is 2002."

For 2002, Emerson expects global oil demand to grow by 700,000 barrels per day (b/d), or roughly shy of 1 percent. In comparison, demand growth for oil globally in 2001 rose by just 300,000 b/d. "I think that's a very, very plausible demand growth," she said.

John Felmy, chief economist for the American Petroleum Institute in Washington, looks at the situation product by product. U.S. gasoline demand is very robust right now, perhaps as a function of the economy, but more likely as a function of people's reluctance to fly, he told Petroleum Finance Week. "It looks like gasoline demand [growth] is running above 2 percent right now for the most recent periods," Felmy said.

Of course, more drivers and fewer flyers mean that jet fuel demand is down considerably, approximately 10 percent or so. Felmy thinks the economic rebound may not help that demand as much as the resolution of security concerns and the shortening of long lines at the airport. On the other hand, diesel fuel demand is directly affected by the economy, he continued. "If we see strong economic growth, you're going to see shipments of products and so on," Felmy said. "Because everything travels by truck, that could be a positive influence."

The Energy Information Administration released its latest short-term energy outlook report last week, predicting that total U.S. petroleum demand is expected to recover only after a weak first half of 2002.

"Assuming an economic recovery accelerating in the latter half of the current year and normal weather, [U.S.] demand growth in 2002 is expected to average 60,000 b/d, or 0.3 percent," it said. "But the first half is expected to witness a substantial decline of 340,000 b/d due to continued economic weakness, recent record-warm weather and low natural gas prices."

EIA projects 2002 second half U.S. demand to be approximately 460,000 b/d higher than during the same period last year. Motor gasoline demand should grow by 2 percent this year, following only 1.4 percent growth in 2001 for the entire year as well as the period following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. EIA still anticipates that commercial jet fuel demand will be 7 percent lower during 2002's initial six months, but 10 percent higher in the second half.

In 2003, EIA expects domestic petroleum demand to climb by 780,000 b/d, or 3.9 percent, pushed by forecast GDP growth of 4 percent. Globally, EIA projects oil demand growth of 600,000 b/d for 2002, down from the 650,000 b/d projected in last month's outlook. In 2003, it expects global oil demand to grow by 1.4 million b/d - with more than half of that coming from the United States - due to an economic recovery.

Petroleum Finance Week, Vol. 10, No. 10

By Jodi Wetuski in Houston

Copyright 2002 PBI Media, LLC. All rights reserved.



To: energyplay who wrote (11544)3/17/2002 10:34:06 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23153
 
Oil Shares Return to Favor as OPEC Drives for Higher Prices

Bloomberg Energy (London), Monday, March 18
By Thomas Tugendhat

Philip Lawlor at Royal London Asset Management bought shares of oil drillers Schlumberger Ltd. and Halliburton Co. Renee Carret of Carret & Co. likes Knightsbridge Tankers Ltd. and Frontline Ltd., two oil transport companies.

Oil shares are rising as OPEC on Friday agreed to maintain production limits through June. The Bloomberg Europe Energy Index is up 14 percent this year, while an index of 500 European stocks is little changed. Four of the five top-ranked oil analysts have boosted forecasts for crude prices, citing OPEC's discipline.

``OPEC compliance over the past six months means the supply has been (managed) much better than people expected,'' said Lawlor, who helps manage $41 billion. ``Ten days ago, we were thinking of trimming positions, but the shares don't look high,'' assuming oil is $2 to $4 higher than the price of $21.89 a barrel on March 1.

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries said oil prices would have to rise by $5 a barrel, or more than 20 percent, before members boosted production. The world economy is recovering and can withstand a higher oil price, ministers said.

Deutsche Bank AG, UBS Warburg AG, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Credit Suisse First Boston have increased their estimates to about $20 a barrel for Brent crude this year.

In the past 15 months, OPEC has cut supplies four times, removing 5 million barrels a day from the market. That's enough to power South and Central America.

`In Control'

OPEC President Rilwanu Lukman said oil must exceed $28 a barrel for their benchmark index before they increase supply. That marker last stood at $22.79.

``OPEC is in control,'' said Daniel J. Rice III, senior vice president and portfolio manager at State Street Research in Boston, who manages the $138 million State Street Research Global Resources Fund. ``This is the most shut-in production that OPEC has ever had. It indicates a compliance from OPEC that we haven't seen before.''

State Street owns about 10 percent of the shares of Calgary- based Baytex Energy Ltd., Rice said. He also likes Calgary-based Hurricane Hydrocarbons Ltd., which explores mostly in Kazakhstan.

Higher oil prices will mean more cash for the biggest oil companies, such as Exxon Mobil Corp., Royal Dutch/Shell Group and BP Plc, and that will mean more to spend on drilling. Kerr-McGee Corp., an Oklahoma City-based oil and gas explorer, said Friday it will boost spending this year by $120 million, or 13 percent.

``If cash flows are going to grow, spending will grow,'' said Lawlor. ``And I see no reason why, with cash flows expanding, service companies won't benefit.''

Shares of Schlumberger, the largest oilfield-services company, have gained 9.7 percent this year, while those of Halliburton, the second-largest, have jumped 27 percent. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index has risen only 1.6 percent.

Refiners Hurt

While rising oil prices have helped the biggest oil companies -- BP shares are up 14 percent this year -- the higher crude price will hurt their refining divisions, which make gasoline and other fuels from crude oil, said Markus Ilg, who helps oversee about 40 billion euros at WestLB Asset Management.

``Because they rely on selling refined products as well as crude oil, the higher oil price will only add 5 percent to the oil majors' earnings,'' Ilg said.

A recovery in demand may also benefit the oil-tanker companies, which ferry millions of barrels a day worldwide. Tanker rates are at a two-year low equal to 85 cents a barrel for shipments from Saudi Arabia, only a fourth the level in November 2000, when oil neared $34 a barrel.

Shares of Hamilton, Bermuda-based Knightsbridge have risen 8.5 percent this year in expectation of higher freight rates, while Norway's Frontline have gained 6.5 percent.

``The tankers are one of the first areas to pick up from interest in oil,'' said Carret, who helps manage $2 billion and owns shares in both shippers.

Iraq

It isn't just OPEC that accounts for the biggest monthly rally in oil prices since May. The threat of war with Iraq, which pumps 3 percent of the world's supply, accounts for a premium of $2 on each barrel of oil, said the Saudi oil minister, Ali al-Naimi.

The U.S. economy is also recovering from the first recession in a decade. Industrial production increased in February for a second month, and consumer confidence rose in March as the U.S. economic rebound gathered pace, Federal Reserve figures showed Friday.

Now that OPEC has reinstated its price range and New York oil prices are seen averaging $23 to $24 a barrel, oil stocks should be up 30 percent to 40 percent, Rice said.

``The key question is: does it happen next week or does it take two or three years?'' he said.