Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (215680)	1/8/2002 1:06:49 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Actually, I have no problem with. I've long felt that that exclusionary rule was really just a way for a desperate or crooked lawyer to get a crook off. Instead of that rule, the court could, say, direct that the cop(s) be fired. That would seem to provide quite sufficient incentive. Thus, I think that the Miranda warning ought to be shortened to informing the suspect of his right to an attorney, even a court appointed one. And I have no problem with that. I will not go to allowing police- -any American police- -to use torture, though.