SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (154272)1/8/2002 11:25:59 AM
From: fingolfen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Don't forget that your fellow AMDroids thought Pentium 4 would have been maxxed out at 1.7 GHz because of "clock-throttling":

Good find!

I honestly don't think I've ever seen as many sour grapes on this board as I have the past couple of days... Maybe the icy grip of reality is starting to squeeze the AMD fanboy club???



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (154272)1/8/2002 12:03:49 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Although the "localized “hot spot” throttling" seems to be
a pure nonsense, I think you found a correct explanation
for current P4 problems - hot spots do not scale as well
as Intel wants.

Why do you guys always try to divert the question?
Feeling uncomfortably with the observation I posted?
I posted three facts supporting my opinion, you
countered it with BS. Do you have anything more
substantial to say, or you agree with my conclusion?

- Ali


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News