SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (215759)1/8/2002 3:10:19 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769669
 
assure me that it is feasible
I think you need to check the double-story angle again. They probably tell you that the long range scenario is feasible, but that's not the scenario that is being proposed. There's more deception in the SDI lobbying than in a decade's back issues of spy-vs-spy.

TP



To: Neocon who wrote (215759)1/8/2002 4:24:18 PM
From: rich4eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Neocon, if the Missile Shield is so easy and feasible, why did the Navy abondon their limited ship defense shield as being too hard. Seems it would be a lot easier to defend a battle group of ten or so ships than the whole US mainland from missile attack. As Tigerpaw said the NMD is a boondoggle and will never work, beside ballistic missiles are less of a threat than piper cubs flying in Tampa.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News