SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (154307)1/8/2002 2:45:58 PM
From: fingolfen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Hence I take it as an internal confirmation that NW yields are erratic.

Ali... I think you're smoking... can you present a reasonable model to support your assertion beyond simple wishful thinking???



To: Ali Chen who wrote (154307)1/8/2002 2:47:11 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Ail - Our Little Screwed Up ScrwewDriver Buddy !!!

Re: "Hence I take it as an internal confirmation that NW
yields are erratic. "

You'll love this - Intel's 0.13 micron Northwood yields are only 3 die/wafer.

Only one of those 3 is fast enough for the 2.2 GHz bin.

Believe it?



To: Ali Chen who wrote (154307)1/8/2002 2:57:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
Ali, so what will your explanation be when Northwood exceeds 2.4 GHz?

Tenchusatsu



To: Ali Chen who wrote (154307)1/8/2002 3:06:52 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Alice Grinch, Re: "you continue to hide from the main question by changing the topic. Hence I take it as an internal confirmation that NW yields are erratic."

Why are you trying to hide from your mistake about thermal throttling? I suppose I should take your comment to mean that you recognize your egregious error, and you are hoping that Tenchusatsu will forgive you.

wbmw