Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : A CANADIAN DIAMOND HUNT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VAUGHN who wrote (572)	1/8/2002 4:40:58 PM
From: Chas.	Respond to of 930

Hi Vaughn, long time no talkee.....Winspear days.... thanks for the response, appreciated. You list some very compelling details about the Jackson Inlet, TWG exploration. I am presently doing further DD.... I am tip toeing around the info that I've seen thus far. It is good to see you back in the Diamond fray once again, it appears we have another mini staking rush in Canada between Quebec and Nunavut. 2002 should offer up a lot of excitement in Canada. regards

To: VAUGHN who wrote (572)	1/8/2002 6:08:17 PM
From: WillP	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 930

Diamond Trading NV has performed valuation services for a number of diamond samples from Canada, Australia and Africa. They did an Ekati evaluation in the late 1990s, at the request, I think, of the Government of Canada. They sell over two million carats of rough per year. As well, Diamond Trading has become a minority shareholder of a Canadian junior explorer. I believe it's name is Twin Mining Corp. Regards, WillP

To: VAUGHN who wrote (572)	1/8/2002 7:06:38 PM
From: jpthoma1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 930

You are right VAUGHN, there a lot of positive about the Jackson Inlet project. Nearly one year ago, I told exactly that to SH posters on TWG thread. Jackson Inlet is« the place to be», I told them! stockhouse.com stockhouse.com But I hope you will admit that there are some weakness in this play. I found only three of them vs your 15 strengths. So It's not so bad! To WillP: I don't attack reputation of DTNV. I just say that according to Norm 43-101, an independant report is preferable. Even if DTNV has disclosed its interest, it's a report made by a non arm's length company and must be appreciated in this context. An experienced man like you surely know to appreciate («interpréter» in french!) anything said or wrote by an important shareholders or insider of a company. ;o) Regards JP