Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Berney who wrote (27271)	1/8/2002 10:32:52 PM
From: Nancy	Respond to of 52237

not to mention the so-called "china wall" between the research and the trading arms of the houses.

To: Berney who wrote (27271)	1/9/2002 12:10:20 AM
From: byhiselo	Respond to of 52237

<It just aggravates me that the regulatory gods continue to allow AOL and others to use this EBITDA and other pro forma methods of accounting with the public that would never be allowed in the financial information that they present to the SEC> ahh yes, does make one wonder imo without pro-forma there is nary a tech company that would have reported 'profits' over the last 3 years(and plenty non-tech as well since they know a good deal when they see it) this will end so badly with much contrition and gnashing of teeth on wall street, fed, white house, corporate boards etc. then a through hen house cleaning will be mandated and implemented and the chickens will once again feel safe holding stocks longer than it takes to digest some primo growth hormone lather, rinse, repeat

To: Berney who wrote (27271)	1/9/2002 4:23:47 PM
From: Trading Machine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 52237

CNBC FINALLY reports why AOL took 60 BILLION charge! They are FINALLY reporting this afternoon AFTER the close on the 60 Billion dollar good will charge that AOL took. Where were they when the conference was going on??? Why didn't they report this when it was readily apparent to everyone else??? Is this responsible, objective reporting? I don't know why you laugh at this, don't you expect responsible, objective reporting out of CNBC? I guess anyone that does is just plain ignorant. Paul K.